<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rask &amp; Bruins Outlast Wild, Sweep Road Trip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/tyanderson/6371/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/tyanderson/6371/</link>
	<description>NHL hockey blogosphere of your favorite team rumors, trades, opinion, recaps, previews and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: best credit card benefits</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/tyanderson/6371/comment-page-1/#comment-45224</link>
		<dc:creator>best credit card benefits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=6371#comment-45224</guid>
		<description>No, but your question does. It is beyond my ken and patience to address such ignorance, but, it suffices to say that you are dead wrong. Every living thing on the planet is the result of natural selection. You have missed the bigger part of a two part evolutionary tale. Random mutation, that is of several varieties for variants, and natural selection, which is the driving force of evolution. The rate of random mutations among humans is pretty well understood. Some mutations are harmful; some are beneficial and some are neutral. They are copying errors and point mutation, transpositions, etc., etc.. All in a population have them all the time. Some are selected naturally, against the background of environment. An incremental increase in fitness leaves more offspring that contain the incremental increase in fitness. Every where, all the time, natural selection is summing up these increases,in response to immediate environmental change. No magic and not fiction. I suggest that you educate yourself further. Perhaps your next attack on mutational theory will have more punch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but your question does. It is beyond my ken and patience to address such ignorance, but, it suffices to say that you are dead wrong. Every living thing on the planet is the result of natural selection. You have missed the bigger part of a two part evolutionary tale. Random mutation, that is of several varieties for variants, and natural selection, which is the driving force of evolution. The rate of random mutations among humans is pretty well understood. Some mutations are harmful; some are beneficial and some are neutral. They are copying errors and point mutation, transpositions, etc., etc.. All in a population have them all the time. Some are selected naturally, against the background of environment. An incremental increase in fitness leaves more offspring that contain the incremental increase in fitness. Every where, all the time, natural selection is summing up these increases,in response to immediate environmental change. No magic and not fiction. I suggest that you educate yourself further. Perhaps your next attack on mutational theory will have more punch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Rask &#38; Bruins Outlast Wild, Sweep Road Trip &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/tyanderson/6371/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Rask &#38; Bruins Outlast Wild, Sweep Road Trip &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=6371#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ty Anderson, HockeyIndependent. HockeyIndependent said: New HI: Rask &amp; Bruins Outlast Wild, Sweep Road Trip http://bit.ly/8dFJ5O #nhl [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ty Anderson, HockeyIndependent. HockeyIndependent said: New HI: Rask &amp; Bruins Outlast Wild, Sweep Road Trip <a href="http://bit.ly/8dFJ5O" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8dFJ5O</a> #nhl [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

