<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Penalties drop sharply in the third period in 2009-10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/</link>
	<description>NHL hockey blogosphere of your favorite team rumors, trades, opinion, recaps, previews and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tree House For Kids</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-43580</link>
		<dc:creator>Tree House For Kids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 18:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-43580</guid>
		<description>Reborn babies dolls range from the basic to elaborate and their process range as much too.  Throughout the final procedure of putting your baby together, you are able to add a magnet to the inside of the head near the mouth.  These artisans use a variety of painting methods that require a high degree of skill.   Moreover, each and every reborn artist would profess that, no two reborn baby dolls are the exact same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reborn babies dolls range from the basic to elaborate and their process range as much too.  Throughout the final procedure of putting your baby together, you are able to add a magnet to the inside of the head near the mouth.  These artisans use a variety of painting methods that require a high degree of skill.   Moreover, each and every reborn artist would profess that, no two reborn baby dolls are the exact same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-19610</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-19610</guid>
		<description>Comfortably, the post is in reality the best on this deserving topic. I fit in with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your next updates. Just saying thanks will not just be enough, for the exceptional clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Authentic work and much success in your business dealings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comfortably, the post is in reality the best on this deserving topic. I fit in with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your next updates. Just saying thanks will not just be enough, for the exceptional clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Authentic work and much success in your business dealings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sung Orf</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-17389</link>
		<dc:creator>Sung Orf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 02:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-17389</guid>
		<description>Remarkable website, where exactly did you find that knowledge in this specific article? I&#039;m pleased I came across it though, ill be checking back soon to check what other posts you could have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarkable website, where exactly did you find that knowledge in this specific article? I&#8217;m pleased I came across it though, ill be checking back soon to check what other posts you could have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11845</guid>
		<description>Thank you igloodreams to raise that question  ! I really like that kind of stat work with hockey data :)

I however agree with Glen, especially when you look at the total number of penalties during each period. If we ignore the penalties given in OT (because OT does not happen every game, and it&#039;s duration is rather short), out of 11 361 penalties, 33% are given in 1st period, 37% in 2nd, and 30% in 3rd. Those stats suggest that the proportion of penalty is almost evenly distributed in the 3 periods. 

Therefore we must analyse the drop for hooking and interference during the third period by asking this question: can those variations be attributed to the way referes attribute penalties in the 3rd period, or the teams play in the 3rd period ? Without any data to verify this, I would be tempted to intuitively believe that teams change their style of play during the 3rd period. 

Theorically, the job of the referees should be the direct cause of the way the teams play. And it seems logical to me that the &quot;time is going up&quot; effect in the end of the game affects the way teams play, according to the game context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you igloodreams to raise that question  ! I really like that kind of stat work with hockey data :)</p>
<p>I however agree with Glen, especially when you look at the total number of penalties during each period. If we ignore the penalties given in OT (because OT does not happen every game, and it&#8217;s duration is rather short), out of 11 361 penalties, 33% are given in 1st period, 37% in 2nd, and 30% in 3rd. Those stats suggest that the proportion of penalty is almost evenly distributed in the 3 periods. </p>
<p>Therefore we must analyse the drop for hooking and interference during the third period by asking this question: can those variations be attributed to the way referes attribute penalties in the 3rd period, or the teams play in the 3rd period ? Without any data to verify this, I would be tempted to intuitively believe that teams change their style of play during the 3rd period. </p>
<p>Theorically, the job of the referees should be the direct cause of the way the teams play. And it seems logical to me that the &#8220;time is going up&#8221; effect in the end of the game affects the way teams play, according to the game context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat - Igloo Dreams</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11786</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat - Igloo Dreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11786</guid>
		<description>@Colin - I agree, and that&#039;s probably a subject for a different post.  This one was just to look at Hooking and Interference and to highlight that while most other penalties didn&#039;t drop significantly in the third, those two did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Colin &#8211; I agree, and that&#8217;s probably a subject for a different post.  This one was just to look at Hooking and Interference and to highlight that while most other penalties didn&#8217;t drop significantly in the third, those two did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11780</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11780</guid>
		<description>But statistically, the second period is the outlier, not the third. It&#039;s numbers are higher in nearly all types of penalties, meaning it&#039;s not that fewer penalties are being called in the third but that more are being called in the second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But statistically, the second period is the outlier, not the third. It&#8217;s numbers are higher in nearly all types of penalties, meaning it&#8217;s not that fewer penalties are being called in the third but that more are being called in the second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11776</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11776</guid>
		<description>Yeah - I actually read the full 2 articles after I posted, so I answered my own question on that one. Heh.

But my first point still stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; I actually read the full 2 articles after I posted, so I answered my own question on that one. Heh.</p>
<p>But my first point still stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat - Igloo Dreams</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11775</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat - Igloo Dreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11775</guid>
		<description>Oilslick - Hooking drops from 661 in the second period to 480 in the third - that&#039;s a 27% drop (same math for Interference - just different numbers)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oilslick &#8211; Hooking drops from 661 in the second period to 480 in the third &#8211; that&#8217;s a 27% drop (same math for Interference &#8211; just different numbers)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat - Igloo Dreams</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11773</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat - Igloo Dreams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11773</guid>
		<description>Colin - There were 50 distinct types of penalties called in 2009-10, which would have made a rather large chart.  I listed most of the ones that happened with regularity... The ones I left off would include things that didn&#039;t happen very often, like Abuse of Officials or Illegal Stick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin &#8211; There were 50 distinct types of penalties called in 2009-10, which would have made a rather large chart.  I listed most of the ones that happened with regularity&#8230; The ones I left off would include things that didn&#8217;t happen very often, like Abuse of Officials or Illegal Stick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oilslick</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11772</link>
		<dc:creator>Oilslick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11772</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure where you get the 27% drop in hooking and interference calls. For hooking, 34% of calls are made in the 1st, 38% in the 2nd and 27% in the 3rd. For interference, the trend is the same, with the numbers being 35%, 37% and 27% respectively. I agree that there are less calls being made in the 3rd period, but the drop isn&#039;t nearly as drastic as you&#039;re making it out to be. Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure where you get the 27% drop in hooking and interference calls. For hooking, 34% of calls are made in the 1st, 38% in the 2nd and 27% in the 3rd. For interference, the trend is the same, with the numbers being 35%, 37% and 27% respectively. I agree that there are less calls being made in the 3rd period, but the drop isn&#8217;t nearly as drastic as you&#8217;re making it out to be. Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11766</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11766</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more, my biggest problem with the NHL this past year was the inconsistency in the officiating, going both ways!!! The refs either need to call everything or call nothing. The players get confused because they&#039;re not sure what their limits are and the fans get confused because they feel the refs are making calls against their team on purpose. I also hate the grey area calls,for instance, goal keeper interference. That in my opinion is the worst for the game. It allows the refs to  make game changing calls and get away with them, when in reality, many other refs could easily look the other way. I think a video showing all violations be sent out at the beginning of the year. If the infraction is on the video, then 2 minutes in the box, if it&#039;s not, then let them play!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more, my biggest problem with the NHL this past year was the inconsistency in the officiating, going both ways!!! The refs either need to call everything or call nothing. The players get confused because they&#8217;re not sure what their limits are and the fans get confused because they feel the refs are making calls against their team on purpose. I also hate the grey area calls,for instance, goal keeper interference. That in my opinion is the worst for the game. It allows the refs to  make game changing calls and get away with them, when in reality, many other refs could easily look the other way. I think a video showing all violations be sent out at the beginning of the year. If the infraction is on the video, then 2 minutes in the box, if it&#8217;s not, then let them play!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11757</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11757</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re looking at the data wrong. In most of the cases you list above, penalties are called more in the third than they are in the first, and are called most in the second. So the real question is why are they calling things more in the second? Is there a reason inherent to the game that makes this happen or is it the refs?

Out of curiosity, what are the infractions you left out of your totals? The total number of penalties called per period in your chart doesn&#039;t add up to the total number of penalties called. What did you leave out and why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re looking at the data wrong. In most of the cases you list above, penalties are called more in the third than they are in the first, and are called most in the second. So the real question is why are they calling things more in the second? Is there a reason inherent to the game that makes this happen or is it the refs?</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, what are the infractions you left out of your totals? The total number of penalties called per period in your chart doesn&#8217;t add up to the total number of penalties called. What did you leave out and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Statistik &#8211; Domarna inkonsekventa &#124; NHLbloggen– en blogg om hockey</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11714</link>
		<dc:creator>Statistik &#8211; Domarna inkonsekventa &#124; NHLbloggen– en blogg om hockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11714</guid>
		<description>[...] Hockey Independet har äntligen bevisat det vi alla trott&#8230; att domare att färre utvisningar i slutet av [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hockey Independet har äntligen bevisat det vi alla trott&#8230; att domare att färre utvisningar i slutet av [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11700</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11700</guid>
		<description>Another factor is the way teams play in the third period.

In a close game, teams will tend to be more cautious about certain things, either protecting a lead or trying to come back. The leading team will often sit back in a more defensive posture.

Play around the net doesn&#039;t change much, so calls like goalie interference and cross-checking see little change. &#039;Accidental&#039; fouls like high-sticking and boarding also see little change.

Extra caution and one team being less aggressive goes a long way towards explaining the discrepancy. I&#039;m not saying the refs are great, and I&#039;m sure there are cases of refs letting things go late in games, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s as much of a problem as the stats suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another factor is the way teams play in the third period.</p>
<p>In a close game, teams will tend to be more cautious about certain things, either protecting a lead or trying to come back. The leading team will often sit back in a more defensive posture.</p>
<p>Play around the net doesn&#8217;t change much, so calls like goalie interference and cross-checking see little change. &#8216;Accidental&#8217; fouls like high-sticking and boarding also see little change.</p>
<p>Extra caution and one team being less aggressive goes a long way towards explaining the discrepancy. I&#8217;m not saying the refs are great, and I&#8217;m sure there are cases of refs letting things go late in games, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s as much of a problem as the stats suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blazer</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11698</link>
		<dc:creator>Blazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11698</guid>
		<description>Another thing to note is that many of the refs increase their H&amp;I calls in the second period, and a few of them stay almost level in the first and third periode, with a large increase in the second.

These are Marc Joannette, Francois St. Laurent, and Paul Devorski (a difference of 3 penalties in 1st and 3rd).

Not sure what exactly there is to take from that, more intense and open game in the 2nd? So for these refs it&#039;s wrong to just look at the difference between 2nd and 3rd periods.

I think its more important to stay consistant on a game to game basis. Different teams play different styles against eachother, rivalries gets tougher. You could argue that there should be a machinistic approach to penalties so every borderline call was made and be consistant that way, but do we really wanna see 60 minutes of penalty killing? 

In my mind its both the hooking rule itself and the enforcement of it that makes this the way it is. I think its healthy to let a few penalties that are easy go, after all its a physically competitive game, and not Basketball. 

And both players and refs do in-game adjustments, what I want is that they are consistant from period to period, and lets the players know it. If they let everything go for the first 12 mins and then suddenly calls everything the last 8 min in a period, that is unbearable. But acknowledging two physically sound teams fighting for 2 points in the third, and letting them play a little on the borderline, that makes for good and fair hockey.

Too bad all the missed infringements that should have been called (obvious holding, hits to the head, cross-checks to the back) doesn&#039;t show up on a stat sheet.  

But that&#039;s a different discussion, anyways good work! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing to note is that many of the refs increase their H&amp;I calls in the second period, and a few of them stay almost level in the first and third periode, with a large increase in the second.</p>
<p>These are Marc Joannette, Francois St. Laurent, and Paul Devorski (a difference of 3 penalties in 1st and 3rd).</p>
<p>Not sure what exactly there is to take from that, more intense and open game in the 2nd? So for these refs it&#8217;s wrong to just look at the difference between 2nd and 3rd periods.</p>
<p>I think its more important to stay consistant on a game to game basis. Different teams play different styles against eachother, rivalries gets tougher. You could argue that there should be a machinistic approach to penalties so every borderline call was made and be consistant that way, but do we really wanna see 60 minutes of penalty killing? </p>
<p>In my mind its both the hooking rule itself and the enforcement of it that makes this the way it is. I think its healthy to let a few penalties that are easy go, after all its a physically competitive game, and not Basketball. </p>
<p>And both players and refs do in-game adjustments, what I want is that they are consistant from period to period, and lets the players know it. If they let everything go for the first 12 mins and then suddenly calls everything the last 8 min in a period, that is unbearable. But acknowledging two physically sound teams fighting for 2 points in the third, and letting them play a little on the borderline, that makes for good and fair hockey.</p>
<p>Too bad all the missed infringements that should have been called (obvious holding, hits to the head, cross-checks to the back) doesn&#8217;t show up on a stat sheet.  </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s a different discussion, anyways good work! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11693</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11693</guid>
		<description>@Fred - Thanks!

@ogie - I don&#039;t know - some other common &quot;discretionary&quot; penalties (like Holding, Roughing, Cross-checking or Slashing) are all essentially flat from the second to the third.  Hooking &amp; Interference drop... 

I have the numbers for each ref for all other calls (other than H&amp;I) - I could publish those for contrast...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fred &#8211; Thanks!</p>
<p>@ogie &#8211; I don&#8217;t know &#8211; some other common &#8220;discretionary&#8221; penalties (like Holding, Roughing, Cross-checking or Slashing) are all essentially flat from the second to the third.  Hooking &amp; Interference drop&#8230; </p>
<p>I have the numbers for each ref for all other calls (other than H&amp;I) &#8211; I could publish those for contrast&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ogie</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11692</link>
		<dc:creator>ogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11692</guid>
		<description>You are not taking one BIG factor into account here. That certain Refs have a style, or a tolerance for how far you can go before they will call something, and it can vary from game to game. 

So it is likely possible that by the third period the players on the ice have learned how far they can stretch it and not get called for a penalty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not taking one BIG factor into account here. That certain Refs have a style, or a tolerance for how far you can go before they will call something, and it can vary from game to game. </p>
<p>So it is likely possible that by the third period the players on the ice have learned how far they can stretch it and not get called for a penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Poulin</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11681</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Poulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11681</guid>
		<description>This confirms a well-known fact that NHL refs are as bad as soccer refs!! Good insight Pat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This confirms a well-known fact that NHL refs are as bad as soccer refs!! Good insight Pat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11671</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11671</guid>
		<description>Al - 

That&#039;s a good point - I can break it down by month and see how it comes out.  Thanks for the suggestion - not sure I would have thought to do look at things that way!

Pat - Igloo Dreams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al &#8211; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point &#8211; I can break it down by month and see how it comes out.  Thanks for the suggestion &#8211; not sure I would have thought to do look at things that way!</p>
<p>Pat &#8211; Igloo Dreams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11658</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11658</guid>
		<description>Greta blog...I knew my eyes weren&#039;t deceiving me.

Someday I would like to know the breakdown of each penalty per month because ...A big problem is the constant change in emphases on certain calls throughout the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greta blog&#8230;I knew my eyes weren&#8217;t deceiving me.</p>
<p>Someday I would like to know the breakdown of each penalty per month because &#8230;A big problem is the constant change in emphases on certain calls throughout the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Penalties drop sharply in the third period in 2009-10 &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/igloodreams/20244/comment-page-1/#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Penalties drop sharply in the third period in 2009-10 &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20244#comment-11651</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof, Hockey Independent. Hockey Independent said: Penalties drop sharply in the third period in 2009-10 by IglooDreams on HockeyIndependent! http://bit.ly/cAl4ib #nhl [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof, Hockey Independent. Hockey Independent said: Penalties drop sharply in the third period in 2009-10 by IglooDreams on HockeyIndependent! <a href="http://bit.ly/cAl4ib" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cAl4ib</a> #nhl [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

