Blackhawks Post-Deadline: Cup Or Bust?
David Morris | Mar 03, 2010 | Comments 7

April 17, 1961: Bobby Hull, Reg Fleming and Pierre Pilote with the Stanley Cup they have just won. Can today's Hawks team repeat the feat? (Photo: Chicago Herald archive)
Blackhawks fans were holding their breath, waiting for the big deal that never came. Now that Deadline Day has passed, many wonder about the Hawks’ Cup chances, especially as rivals have upgraded their personnel.
Instead of the move pundits predicted–for a goalie– Stan Bowman made some minor deals. So, was he right to stand pat, or has he missed the window of opportunity?
Leading up to March 3rd, the chatter presuming netminders Tomas Vokoun, Dwayne Roloson, Jaroslav Halak, Dan Ellis and Marty Turco were all on Bowman’s shopping list, grew louder.
As the clock ticked down to 3 p.m. Eastern Time, fifty-three players in thirty separate trades—a Deadline Day record—changed addresses, but none made their way out of, or into, Chicago.
Nor were big names involved. Interviewed on NHL Network’s ‘Power Play’ that afternoon, Sabres GM Darcy Regier noted the transactions were really more about depth players. He observed that teams chose to retain most of the impending UFAs who might help them keep pace, as playoff spots in both conferences are tightly contested.
When asked Wednesday afternoon by reporters in Chicago about whether or not he was ‘disappointed’ about the Hawks’ lack of activity, Stan Bowman replied: “No, not really. You go in there hoping to improve your team, and sometimes there are things that work out, and sometimes not. But we’ve come a long way with the group we have, and we didn’t want to do anything just to make a trade. Because that, could disrupt our group.”
Video of the interview from Blackhawks TV here:
http://blackhawks.nhl.tv/team/console.jsp?catid=690&id=61613
Here’s a segment-by-segment snapshot of what Stan Bowman didn’t do:
Goaltending
After the collapse in Long Island Tuesday night, the howls of anguish over Cristobal Huet and Antti Niemi’ s qualifications, or lack thereof, might have convinced even the most stoic Hawks loyalist that something had to give.
Nothing did, and Cristobal Huet was picked to start against the Oilers Wednesday night in Chicago against the Oilers.
But if the Hawks were talking, what were the asking prices for the potential replacements, and what would the consequences of a transaction have been?
In the case of Vokoun, his 5.7 million dollar cap hit made such a deal impractical unless Florida took Huet’s contract in return. For all the talk about ‘sweeteners’, the reality is simple. Randy Sexton had no compelling reason to trade an Olympic starting goaltender with just one year left on his deal. And according to ESPN Chicago, trying to waive Huet to take his cap hit off the books would have created other impediments, related to ‘tagging’—the arcane term given to the NHL’s procedure of calculating how existing salaries impact cap space. In other words, a deal couldn’t be made.
Dwayne Roloson might have been available. But with Rick DiPietro being out indefinitely, Garth Snow evidently didn’t want to let his best goaltender go, the other assumption being he did not want Huet’s fiscal burden.
Indications are that none of the other potential partners, Nashville, Montreal or Dallas, with playoff spots in the balance, wanted to make a change on the goaltending front enough, to barter with Bowman.
Defense:
After the trade for Kim Johnsson, who helps alleviate the workload for Keith and Seabrook, the prevailing wisdom was that a depth defenseman was the next logical requirement. To address that, ex-Duck Nick Boynton, a tenacious and genuinely nasty blueliner, has been obtained for future considerations. He’ll stay parked in Rockford until the elasticity of playoff rosters allows him to be brought up to Chicago. In this case, Bowman may have scored another win.
With hulking battle-scarred veteran Jassen Cullimore also waiting in the wings as an Ice Hog, the Blackhawks hope they have enough truculence in their 7/8/9 defense reserve to weather the playoff wars.
The uncertain status of Brent Sopel, sitting with a ‘lower body injury’, may test those reserves early.
Forward:
The Blackhawks may finally be able to ice a full line up as March unfolds. While John Madden is nursing a knee, Ben Eager is ready to resume hostilities. Dave Bolland, who says he feels better than he did before his surgery, is re-gaining his form. Agitator par excellence, Adam Burish, fresh from rehab, is chomping at the bit.
While questions have been asked about depth at the forward position, it seems that management has determined that the Hawks have a full complement.
The fact that a quality player like Colin Fraser was designated a healthy scratch on Tuesday, indicates there may be a rotating taxi squad from now until season’s end as players compete for spots. Additionally, the Boys of Rockford, like Bickell, Dowell, Brophy and Klinkhammer—and perhaps some younger prospects like Aliu and Beach, might just sport the Indian Head as the playoffs open.
Key Stats:
With a winning percentage of .701, the Hawks are on course for 114 points, best total in franchise history. Their fourteen-point lead in the Central Division appears secure, and they have a legitimate shot at the President’s Trophy.
The Blackhawks have nine players with more than ten goals so far, and eight with plus/minus numbers better than +10. Their team GAA of 2.36 is second best in the league. Their offense ranks fourth; power play and penalty kill rank 8th and 6th respectively. Their ten short-handed goals are best in the NHL.
Intangibles:
The Hawks’ six Olympians, Toews, Keith, Seabrook, Kane, Hossa and Kopecky all raised their play to new levels on the international stage. Can they do that going forward? If so, the Blackhawks have a key element working in their favor.
How good are the Hawks’ Cup chances?
The controversy surrounding Chicago’s perceived weakness—its goaltending—persists. However, the panel on TSN’s Trade Deadline Show, an unforgiving array of experienced observers including Mike Keenan, Matthew Barnaby, Craig McTavish, Bob McKenzie, Pierre McGuire, Darren Pang, and Ray Ferraro, all concurred that the Hawks are strong enough to be Cup favorites—along with the Washington Capitals, who have, in their view, equally questionable netminding.
Furthermore, in their review of the competition, no team has a combination of goalies and overall talent which is clearly superior to Chicago’s.
The Las Vegas line seems to support this perspective. As of this writing, Belmont Sports Betting lists the Hawks and Caps as 4-1 favorites; the Sharks and Penguins are right behind at 5-1. Which only means, that Chicago’s chances are as good as anyone’s.
Summary:
Stan Bowman and the Hawks Executive have decided to put their trust in the players they have. Every one of the players—with the exception of those signed to ‘core deals’—is also on notice: those who fail to deliver performance-wise may find themselves packaged up and shipped off come the summer trading period in June.
Because when millions of dollars—perhaps hundreds of millions, depending how many rounds a team can go—in playoff and ancillary revenue are on the line, hockey isn’t a game anymore. It’s an unforgiving business.
And if Blackhawks management has demonstrated anything in the past year, it’s that they aren’t sentimental when it comes to making business decisions.
Filed Under: Chicago Blackhawks • Featured • NHL • NHL Teams • Western Conference
About the Author: David Morris' hockey writing has been featured at KuklasKorner.com and Chicago Sports Then & Now. He is also the North American correspondent for leading Swiss hockey site, Planete Hockey.

[...] for the rest of the year and thus clearing room for Vokoun, you say. Well, the omnipresent Dave Morris reminds us all about that whole “tagging” issue. Regardless of where Huet finishes this year, the fact that he’s playing on a one-way [...]
@Fifth Feather>ESPN Chicago didn’t go into exhaustive detail as to the hows and whys of tagging in regards to Huet’s contract.
But it appears, depending on one’s interpretation of Stan Bowman’s statements from his interview, that management did try to explore, without success, various options that would have allowed them to get Huet’s salary off the books in order to facilitate a trade.
It may or may not be signiifcant that Scotty Bowman gave an interview on sports radio 590Am in Toronto yesterday that said there was no chance the Hawks would deal for Vokoun.
http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/blackhawks/post/_/id/4662165/scotty-bowman-hawks-wont-get-vokoun
I think it’s safe to assume that the Hawks explored options to improve just about anything.
I’m not disappointed that the Hawks didn’t make a move at goalie as I’ve been pretty consistent in saying that the names being thrown about did not really impress me. You don’t make a major goal tending move like that for, at best, an incremental upgrade. Sure, if you can land Ryan Miller, go for it…but for Turco or Roloson? Come on…
The talk of moving Huet to Rockford is nuts as well. Regardless of the salary, the simple fact remains that it doesn’t make the Hawks a better team. Who are they going to call up? The UFA goal tending list isn’t very impressive either. Heck, no gold chip goaltender hits the market until 2014 when Ryan, Kippa and Lundy hit the market. And Kippa would be at the tail end of the career. So who are you freeing up dollars for if you send Huet to the minors?
The tagging implications pretty much means that if Huet went to the minors, and his salary was backfilled, there’s no way he can be called up. With no sure fire replacement available in this season’s trade pool or the upcoming UFA’s… Putting him in the minors also makes him impossible to trade.
People need to stop smoking the crack rocks.
@Shreuw> you’ve made a number of excellent points.
When Huet was signed by Tallon, there really weren’t many UFA options available either…and Huet benefited from the organization’s largesse.
It might even be fair to say that the Hawks’ recent experiences with UFA goalies (Huet, Khabibulin) sum up the risks in signing ones with large contracts.
And for those who saw Vokoun as the savior, there are ample caveats. While Vokoun has played well this year, people forget last season that Craig Anderson successfully challenged him for the starting job. And that Vokoun was previously displaced in Nashville by Dan Ellis and Chris Mason.
There’s no guarantee he would have been worth the financial risk.
The most attractive aspects of Roloson were the price and his evident ability to deliver outstanding performances. But could he hold up in a playoff series? Who knows? After all, he went down with an injury in the run to the Cup Final for the Oilers a few years back.
Goalies, are, for the most part, a crap shoot.
Like your blog alot and have to agree with most all you have said
The Hawks would never want Kiprusoff, because that would mean they would no longer be able to shoot on him.
I’m sure Stan did his due diligence yesterday, but the fact is, the only goalie who would have represented an upgrade (Vokoun) that may have been available probably carried too steep a price tag.
They’re 14 deep at forward as of Sunday, and plenty deep at the blueline.
If they play their game, as they did last night vs. Edmonton, keeping the puck in the offensife zone and using all 5 skaters to virtually eliminate shooting lanes, they’ll win the damn trophy.
Lee>thanks for the kudos and for stopping by to visit.
Fork> agreed. As you say, the key is for the Blackhawks to play to the level of their talent. If Huet and Niemi can provide at least reliable goaltending, the Hawks should be able to maintain their 2nd seed…maybe get a 1st.
As Toews said in the Chicago Herald today, “Our goaltenders are the ones taking the heat, but we need to play better in front of them.”
I think it’s realistic to expect the team can go .600 or even .650, which would give them (I think) 115-117 points. Going .500 would give them 108, which is still better than what they earned last year.