Comments on: Logic and Netting: An Idea For Video Replay

By: jobs in graphic design

jobs in graphic design — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:18:56 +0000

I don’t accept as true with this post. Nevertheless, I had researched in Bing and I have found out you are correct and I seemed to be thinking in the wrong way. Keep on writing good quality material similar to this.

By: Chris

Chris — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:37:45 +0000

I didn’t watch the game, so the picture above is all I have to go on. In the picture, the glove is not completely over the line. We know that the puck is in the glove, but can’t see where. Since the puck has to completely cross the line, I think I agree with the call to not overturn (assuming it was called a no goal at ice level). Why it wouldn’t have been called a goal in the first place is beyond me.

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:31:53 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by ryan_batty: @Stay_Classy calls for logic from the #NHL when reviewing goals. http://bit.ly/1PE76G…

By: Tweets that mention Logic and Netting: An idea for video replay | Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com

Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:46:17 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof and Scott Lewis, Ryan Batty. Ryan Batty said: @Stay_Classy calls for logic from the #NHL when reviewing goals. http://bit.ly/1PE76G [...]

By: Nick Giglia

Nick Giglia — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:08:33 +0000

Burgundy, it’s a good idea.
The best solution may be technological – Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags could be installed across the goal line and ringing the outside of the puck. It wouldn’t be hard to have a wireless network set up that would activate the RFID and trigger the goal when all tags cross the boundary. At that point, all you’d have to do is determine if the net was off, the time ran out, etc. before it went in.
There would be SOME challenges (like the low temperature) but it could be done….I asked Bettman about that on his radio show last year, and he dodged it. I’m not hopeful they’ll do it.

By: Burgundy

Burgundy — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:27:33 +0000

@Penguins March – I love the idea. Can we have the Penguin (official monitoring the parascope must be Danny DeVito or someone of close resemblance). Something I’ve always thought – why can’t pucks be injected with a chemical that goes under special cameras? Sort of like infrared or those FBI heat cameras, etc… You know? At least then, there’d be no argument where the puck is, regardless of gloves, bodies or anything else covering it.

@RyanB – Thanks for the comments and for the twitter note. You’ve been doing some great blogs lately.

@Matt – Yup. I agree with you. Need to make sure we get the call right. That’s where the emphasis should be.

By: PenguinsMarch

PenguinsMarch — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:02:30 +0000

The overhead camera and net-cam are good ideas, but I’d love to see the NHL step into the 22nd century by putting in an innovative under-the-ice cam. i.e. a camera that’s embedded in the ice that points up and scans the area inside the goal. Obviously, they would need some technology to illumine the ice and delineate the goal line when bodies, sticks, skates and the goalie’s trapper block out light, but it might conclusively resolve some of the currently inconclusive situations where a goalie traps the puck maybe-in-the-net, maybe-in-the-crease.

I’m sure I’ve seen the idea used in submarine technology.

By: RyanB

RyanB — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:45:03 +0000

If it’s logical the NHL will run in the other direction.

Smaller netting and bars – it seems simple enough to me.

By: TheMatt

TheMatt — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:53:38 +0000

I’ve been saying for years there should be another (thin) line behind the goal line in the net, and the difference between the two lines should be just wider than the diameter of a puck. It wouldn’t be applicable in this situation but for a lot of replays all the would have to see is whether or not the puck touches the second line at all.
Could make a difference and doesn’t affect the esthetics of a rink