IS THE LIGHT STILL ON? A Special Report On The Lighthouse Project

lighton

If one listened to the cacophony of voices that were left as October 3rd came and went, one would have heard shrill and concerned voices fraught with panic, anger, frustration, rumor and innuendo. Listening, one would construe that Brooklyn or Queens were imminent. Brooklyn and Queens, two places that are rife with the kind of opposition, protest and lawsuits that makes this impasse with the Lighthouse Project and the Town of Hempstead look like a cakewalk.

Brooklyn’s Atlantic Yards got rid of their architect back in early summer that was going for the huge venue that could have also fit the hockey ice and sizing that it needs. Instead, they changed gears and went cheap/fast due to sheer economics which has changed the fabric and aim of what that project was originally going for…the moon. Under the current schema, hockey is NOT and CANNOT be included. Atlantic Yard’s also faces fierce opposition, despite a recent legal win.

Queen’s Willets Point, despite the Chamber of Commerce huckster that uses the press to send the NY Islanders an invite every chance he gets, has a lot of ways to go. They are preparing for a war with the current business owners who are gathered and suing. Fact is, they will use the NY Islanders name as much as they can to try to quantify the many blockades they will see as they attempt to move forward.

Neither of these routes are paved with gold as the good rumors say. Above all, they will not have one iota of what Charles Wang originally aimed to do when he conceived of the Lighthouse Project. These are follies and side stories as people try to pretend that this Nassau County plan, years and millions in the making, somehow doesn’t matter.

It matters.

It means everything.

Two sides sit talking without the news apparatus and public relations hoopla that reached a crescendo with opening night on October 3rd where we heard heated rhetoric along with polticalization. Tom Suozzi dropped that puck, as the Islanders and Lighthouse Project seemed to drop a cultivated message before it all went vweewy vweeewy qwwwwwiet.

So happened?

Kate Murray and Charles Wang met earlier last week on Wednesday. Just the two of them. Plain and simple. Hopefully a conversation that remains positive and constructive continues. The more we don’t hear on all of this is probably for the better.

Meanwhile, labor has been flexing a bit of muscle with some ads in Newsday as well as an online petition. Labor has a huge role here in the process in that the Lighthouse Project stands as a recession buster, able to employ thousands upon thousands in what is still dark times.

Labor stands to reason to be a far more piece of leverage for the Lighthouse Project than Willets Point and Atlantic Yards catcalls. The fact is, the Town of Hempstead would have a lot to explain for this year and after if the project failed to be passed and land remained unused as the economics around the county got tighter and tighter.

Speaking of tighter and tighter, the polls for Tom Suozzi, who has been a huge cheerleader for the Lighthouse Project, has found his polls getting that way. Those concerned about the Lighthouse Project’s politicization have now become even more so as Suozzi’s lead over Ed Mangano has shrunk to single digits. Suozzi will likely need to spend some cash to keep distance, meanwhile the 4 legislature seats are still “too close to call”.

suozzipuckdrop

Which will drop faster, my polls or this puck?

These is some concern that the Lighthouse might be used as crowbar to wedge into the battle, despite the fact Mangano has not said a word for or against the Nassau County Exec who is trying to get re-elected.If so, the rhetoric and far deeper rift between Republicans and Democrats that has been magnified by a recession and deep-set anger by constituents who are feeling it’s pain could burst any lucid conversation and negotiation apart.

So, as we sit just over a week deeper past Charles Wang’s October 3rd gong of “certainty”, what is certain is that both sides spoke and agreed for further discussion and to the people that will be involved. No, this is not certainty. But at least it is a start. May it continue unencumbered by anything else.

What if Patrick did not produce signs for 10/03's Islanders game?

What if Patrick did not produce signs for 10/03's Islanders game?

Share this nice post:

Filed Under: FeaturedNew York IslandersNHL

Tags:

About the Author: B.D. Gallof is a published writer and hockey blogger. He is one of the charter members of the NY Islander's Blog Box program. He was the NY Islanders blogger for Hockeybuzz.com from 2007 till the beginning of 2009.. He then went solo at IslandersIndependent.com where he got very involve in the Lighthouse Project, reporting it from both sides: The Islanders and also The Town of Hempstead. BD has been written up in Sports Illustrated, TSN.ca, the NY Times Slapshots blog, Yahoo's Sports and SportsBusiness Journal. He is a featured blogger for The Huffington Post, as well as owner, lead writer, and managing editor at HockeyIndependent.com.

RSSComments (4)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. [...] the article here: IS THE LIGHT STILL ON? A Special Report On The Lighthouse Project … Posted in Lighthouse. Tags: charles, charles-wang, Lighthouse, nassau, nassau-county, one-iota, [...]

  2. TPJM22 says:

    Your first paragraph proved how wrong the whole article was.  NOTHING could be more difficult than the charade that has been the LH project and the levels of political chaos.  Queens can use eminent domain to get rid of the business owners.  Atlantic Yards recent legal win provides momentum and the Russian billionaire is further proof of adding on and the arena can be modified for hockey if it’s wanted bad enough.

    Wang  gets by on the cheap for NYI while he pursues what really matters to him (clue: it doesn’t involve hockey, the Islanders or you).

    This team sucks. It cannot be denied. The roster is putrid. Instead of building on the excitement of Tavares, they did nothing. I know I should be “patient” because the past 16 years of patience just hasn’t been enough but MHO is we’re getting hosed.

    Frankly, if there is any alternative at all that involves the Islanders staying in the metro area and does not involve Wang and his unbroken record of putrid hockey, horrendous management and miserable on ice personnel decisions and contracts, and his friggin Lighthouse, I’m all ears.
     

    • CMOHR says:

      Amen to that!  Good comments above.
      Wang could make money(or at least prevent the hemorrhaging) with a new, state-of-the-art coliseum.  But he also needs to realize it isn’t the arena that will attract fans and free agents alike, it’s a winning team with a winning culture.  Just look at the Penguins.  Granted , they are getting a new arena.   Wang is using the Islanders as a pawn in his game.   I have nothing against a revised, smaller scale Lighthouse project but unfortunately Wang is in a position of power by threatening to move the Islanders if his demands are not met.  Long Island may be facing a situation akin to the Quebec Nordiques in the early 90′s.  This team is only a couple of stud forwards and defensemen from being good enough to compete with the best on a daily basis.   After years of toiling in the basement and alienating the fan base, I don’t want to hand over that potential to some other city because of the actions of one hard headed person.  NY Islander fans deserve better.