<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NHL DRAFT DAY WINNERS &amp; LOSERS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/</link>
	<description>NHL hockey blogosphere of your favorite team rumors, trades, opinion, recaps, previews and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDGallof</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/comment-page-1/#comment-9775</link>
		<dc:creator>BDGallof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=18751#comment-9775</guid>
		<description>There has been a complaint by one NYR blogger...unfortunately in a very childish and petulant way. How is it biased to question the VALUE of choosing McIlrath when Cam Fowler/Gormley are on the board? Who cares if TSN thought he projected or would be taken at 15. What dmen are in the Rangers system ready to make cut? McIlrath still has skating issues to work out. I spoke to one organzation who pegged him a 3rd or 4th pairing dman at best. 

Most of all, before marking the Rangers draft, I spoke to Scott, my NYR and blogging brother for his take. His was even more negative than my take. 

McIlrath can turn into a great and fearsome fighter and all that wonderful stuff. The question and issue...taken up by MANY a blogger...including Ranger ones...is the value of taking him in the top of the 1st round. Most feel that is the place to grab a top 2 pairing dman. 

Draft and thus criticism is on getting best value. For example, Ducks just sit pretty and get two guys who were slated for first half of draft. Thats getting great value. 

Whether McIll or Fowler have the better career is another question entirely. But I will guarantee, when you look outside the fan pom poms, the opinions diverge in ways you don&#039;t want as a Rangers fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a complaint by one NYR blogger&#8230;unfortunately in a very childish and petulant way. How is it biased to question the VALUE of choosing McIlrath when Cam Fowler/Gormley are on the board? Who cares if TSN thought he projected or would be taken at 15. What dmen are in the Rangers system ready to make cut? McIlrath still has skating issues to work out. I spoke to one organzation who pegged him a 3rd or 4th pairing dman at best. </p>
<p>Most of all, before marking the Rangers draft, I spoke to Scott, my NYR and blogging brother for his take. His was even more negative than my take. </p>
<p>McIlrath can turn into a great and fearsome fighter and all that wonderful stuff. The question and issue&#8230;taken up by MANY a blogger&#8230;including Ranger ones&#8230;is the value of taking him in the top of the 1st round. Most feel that is the place to grab a top 2 pairing dman. </p>
<p>Draft and thus criticism is on getting best value. For example, Ducks just sit pretty and get two guys who were slated for first half of draft. Thats getting great value. </p>
<p>Whether McIll or Fowler have the better career is another question entirely. But I will guarantee, when you look outside the fan pom poms, the opinions diverge in ways you don&#8217;t want as a Rangers fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDGallof</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/comment-page-1/#comment-9729</link>
		<dc:creator>BDGallof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=18751#comment-9729</guid>
		<description>They took Jaden early, but he was still considered a 1st rounder. Tarasenko has the talent, but does he have the desire to play in the NHL? With those two factors, hard to grade them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They took Jaden early, but he was still considered a 1st rounder. Tarasenko has the talent, but does he have the desire to play in the NHL? With those two factors, hard to grade them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Q</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/comment-page-1/#comment-9728</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=18751#comment-9728</guid>
		<description>I agree on Anaheim. I thought the Blues did well with Schwartz and Tarasenko. Grabbed some highend skill up front. Something they don&#039;t have in the system right now with the loss of Eller. Moving an under sized and years away  &quot;maybe&quot; in Warsofsky for a NHL player in Sobotka is under valued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on Anaheim. I thought the Blues did well with Schwartz and Tarasenko. Grabbed some highend skill up front. Something they don&#8217;t have in the system right now with the loss of Eller. Moving an under sized and years away  &#8220;maybe&#8221; in Warsofsky for a NHL player in Sobotka is under valued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Battfist</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/comment-page-1/#comment-9721</link>
		<dc:creator>Battfist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=18751#comment-9721</guid>
		<description>Lets Go Islanders!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets Go Islanders!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Poulin</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/comment-page-1/#comment-9718</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Poulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=18751#comment-9718</guid>
		<description>Good analysis of a rather boring draft, especially as a Hab fan. I glad of the Tinordi pick but other than that it was pretty quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis of a rather boring draft, especially as a Hab fan. I glad of the Tinordi pick but other than that it was pretty quiet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention NHL DRAFT DAY WINNERS &#38; LOSERS? &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/bdgallof/18751/comment-page-1/#comment-9717</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention NHL DRAFT DAY WINNERS &#38; LOSERS? &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=18751#comment-9717</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof, BDGallof and LightningShout, Hockey Independent. Hockey Independent said: On HockeyIndependent: NHL DRAFT DAY WINNERS &amp; LOSERS? Best draft value, draft mistakes, miscues and more http://bit.ly/caZhEb #nhldraft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof, BDGallof and LightningShout, Hockey Independent. Hockey Independent said: On HockeyIndependent: NHL DRAFT DAY WINNERS &amp; LOSERS? Best draft value, draft mistakes, miscues and more <a href="http://bit.ly/caZhEb" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/caZhEb</a> #nhldraft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

