The most noticible name missing from the short list is Matt D’Agostini.

Reaction came predictable and quick as the news spread. In a season filled with career best totals for the Habs castoff, “Dags” quickly became a fan favorite. A ray of sunlight through overcast sky of injuries and ownership drama.

Why allow him to walkaway for nothing? It makes no sense!

A valid point. Comparitvely cheap and productive depth is something all 30 NHL clubs can’t afford to lose. Let alone the Blues who are always desperate to maximize return on investment with so little wiggle room in the checkbook.

A stronger sense of desperation also applies to the need to play more than 82 games. Failing to make the playoffs for the sixth time in seven seasons will not entice buyers to seal the deal and free Dave Checketts from his NHL burden to have his fun in the NBA. Like any good salesmen, he knows sweetining the pot is sometimes needed.

Suppose Doug Armstrong has been given a green light to add more than a Splenda packet in the mix. Think more like a 1lb bag if pure cane sugar.

With every contract to date this off season he’s been able to min/max. Make a minimum investment to maximize return for role filled. Effectively squeezing out every ounce of available funds for the right deal for the right impact player with the right contract comes along.

Increasing payroll above the historical norm is a calculated risk that now appears to be the right time to take. Consensus puts the figure right at the $48.3 million cap floor. The budget is generally expected to top out at $49 million with the flexibility to jump $3 to $4 million above for the “that player”.

To some the proposition of such a scenario is outlandish. Traditionally, the Blues have not invested so much in payroll. With ownership in limbo, why add more debt? The greater the debt to absorb, the fewer who have the capability to take it. Limitations are not advanageous in this case.

While true, professional sports franchises are not cash cows and any perspective owner knows this. Breaking even is the best case scenario for many. No team will do so, at least consistently, without winning. Right now, the Blues aren’t winning. Not even in the Charlie Sheen sense.

Winning trumps investment. Long term growth options are a benefit, not a detraction.

Keep in mind that the year is 2011. Not 2006. Bill Laurie era thinking does not apply. There will be no great sell off of key assets to drive down value. No blue light special deal to buy the Blues. Checketts doesn’t believe that will bring in quality offers and he is right. Instead assets will be added to bring the product available for sale up to a value equal the asking price.

Whether that comes in the form of a franchise player or added quality depth to bolster chances at a playoff berth remains to be seen.

There is a forest through the trees. A method to the madness. A little patience goes a long way because answers are coming soon.

—

According to a tweet from Andy Strickland the Blues and Oshie have agreed to a one-year deal. An announcement is expected later this morning.

St. Louis Post Dispatch beat writer Jeremy Rutherford says the two sides are close.

The financials will determine if there is room to bring back D’Agostini or if the Blues will pursue someone like Anthony Stewart.

(Edit: The Blues have confirmed a one year deal with Oshie. One year at $2.35 million.)

Following those two have been defensemen Nikita Nikitin, forwards TJ Hensick, Chris Porter, Vladimir Sobotka and prospect Sebastian Wannstrom.

Scott Neer / TSN Photography

Nikita Niktin agreed to a one year, one way deal worth $600,000 on June 9th. In his first season in the NHL the Omsk, Russia native appeared in 63 games between St. Louis (41) and the Blues AHL affiliate, the Peoria Rivermen (22). Between the two clubs Niktin totaled 4 goals and 23 points. The 25 year old defenseman was a Restricted Free Agent.

Heading in to next season’s training camp “N64″ will most likely be fighting Ian Cole for the 6th spot on the defensive depth chart. Assuming the 7th position goes to a Darryl Sydor type signing. The one way nature of the contract suggests Nikitin will likely win the contest.

TJ Hensick signed a two year valued at $1.2 million if he can stick with the NHL roster. In the AHL the salary drops to $105,000 in 2011-12 and $300,000 in 2012-13. The 25 year old Lansing, Michigan native split time between St. Louis and Peoria last season. Registering just 1 goal and 3 points in 13 games with the big club, but leading the Rivermen with 21 goals and 69 points in 59 games.

The deal is more addressing needs with the Blues minor league affiliate than depth concerns in St. Louis. Hensick was an outstanding producer in the AHL, but shying from contact and slow decision making at the NHL level kept him from taking advantage of two opportunities on Davis Payne’s scoring lines. That said, the carrot of another chance to break in to the NHL is there.

Gritty forward Chris Porter made as many trips down I-55 as Hensick, but he capitalized on the opportunity. Agreeing to a one year, two way deal paying $600,000 in NHL salary and $105,000 in the AHL. The Toronto, Ontario native has tallied 4 goals and 9 points in 51 career NHL games. All of which have been with the Blues. In 2010-11 he registered 3 goals and 7 points in 45 games.

Porter may have been given on year less than his Peoria teammate, but his path to minutes in St. Louis is much clearer. Porter will likely fill the 12th forward role if Armstrong is unable to acquire veteran experience on the bottom two lines. If free agents are to be had, Porter will likely be the first on recall when injuries strike.

Scott Neer / TSN Photography

Super Tweener Vladimir Sobotka agreed to a three year, $3.9 million deal basically the same day as Polak, but paperwork hold ups delayed the official signing till June 15th. The escalating salary goes from $1.2 million (11-12), to $1.3 million (12-13) and finally $1.4 million (13-14). An AAV of $1.3 million. In 65 games with the Blues last season Sobotka totaled 7 goals and 29 points. In 199 career NHL games the Trebic, Czech Republic native has amassed 13 goals and 51 points.

Sobotka really filled a void for the Blues with his effective play up and down the lineup. As either the 3rd or 4th center and as one of the two scoring line left wingers. As needs dictated, Sobotka responded. In kind the Blues were willing to commit to the one who made checking specialist center Jay McClement expendable. Sobotka’s salary is a slight raise over McClement’s. There is also a heavier expectation to contribute offensively.

Sebastian Wannstrom

On Thursday June 16th the Blues announced the signing of 2010 2nd round pick Sebastian Wannstrom to a three year Entry Level Contract (ELC). The 20 year old Gavle, Sweden native spent most of the 2010-11 season with Brynas of the SEL. Amassing just a pair of assists in 45 games. In 15 games total of international play for Sweden he totaled 11 points (4 goals, 7 assists).

Wannstrom will spend at least another season maturing in the SEL before making the across he pond. Once he does the likely destination is Peoria to acclimate himself to the North American game. Don’t let the numbers fool you. Scoring in Europe is not the same as scoring in the US and Canada. There is plenty of skill as well as defensive competence to fashion a top 9 winger on a NHL roster. The Swedish article that broke the story cited Wannstrom’s 2011 WJC performance as catching the Blues attention. In 6 games he tallied 2 goals and 5 points as one of Sweden’s top performers.

Next on the List?

The list of those to re-sign is gradually dwindling. Key names to take note of are: TJ Oshie, Matt D’Agostini, BJ Crombeen, Ben Bishop, Ryan Reaves, Tyson Strachan and Adam Cracknell.

The Oshie / D’Agostini dynamic is the key to the plans for draft day and beyond. Both likely fall in to the same spot on the roster, the second or third right winger. Armstrong loves to deal from strength. A situation worth monitoring, but further discussion is best left to another blog where it can be addressed in proportionate detail.

Scott Neer / TSN Photography

There is a very good chance that Bishop is the next to come to terms. He is a local boy who wants to play in St. Louis and has paid a good bit of his dues in Peoria already. He is seeking a one way deal to keep him in his “hometown”. The Blues may not be willing to commit unless the salary comes down. A deal similar to Nikitin’s is a likely compromise. Though a two way deal is not totally out of the question.

Note that UFAs Cam Janssen and Ty Conklin were left off the list. Per a report by Andy Strickland neither will be returning. At least as players. A large contingent of fans argues that Janssen is actually better served working in the Blues PR and Marketing departments.

Bishop would fill Conklin’s role and Reaves is very likely the 13th forward in St. Louis to replace Bam Bam Cam.

The Czech Republic native was drafted 180th overall (6th Round) in the 2004 NHL Entry Draft. In 227 career games with the Blues he has amassed 49 points and 143 penalty minutes. Polak represented Czech Republic at the 2010 Winter Olympics. One of three Blues players to represent their country in the Vancouver games.

According to the Blues official website, General Manager Doug Armstrong had this to say regarding Polak:

“We believe Roman is one of the top defensive defensemen in the league who plays against the opposing teams best players night after night,” said Armstrong. “He’s one of our top penalty killers who is just reaching the prime of his career and we’re happy to have him in the fold for the next five years.”

A five year term may look excessive on the outside, especially given the type of contracts Armstrong has given to young 20-somethings while GM. However, its a delightfully slick move. As Polak has done something others haven’t.

Established himself.

In his first full campaign he steadily rose through the depth chart as injuries decimated the defensive core. Eventually earning an audition on the top pairing with Barret Jackman. The two became a very successful shutdown pairing and the backbone of the effort late in the 2008-09 season that gave the Note a playoff berth. His solid play continued through 2009-10 and in to 2010-11 till Sidney Crosby’s skate carved in to his wrist. Severing a tendon which required surgery to repair.

His less than standard level of play in his return is the last impression in most minds. But that is not the Polak that signed on for half a decade of service today. The 2008 to October 2010 version is who will come to camp in September. The bull dog defender with the speed of a greyhound.

Such a contract should give an indication to where the Blues feel Kevin Shattenkirk fits in to next season’s plans. Not to say that he is expendable now that Polak has been taken care of. More so that roles for 2011-12 have likely been defined.

The contract puts Polak in correct comparative territory with Douglas Murray of the San Jose Sharks. A player capable of eating 20+ minutes a game but more because of defensive assignments and penalty killing duties. The setup Polak thrived in for two seasons. When Shattenkirk arrived he was given significant ice time, played around the 20 minute mark, which showed some gaps in his defensive game.

Insulating Shattenkirk with reduced even strength minutes and increased power play time (where he was at his best) is the likely course of action.

When the Blues struggled to win games following the purge trades of late February it was due to inadequate defense. Testing Shattenkirk was a necessary evil to gage his abilities. Now that his current limits are known Polak can resume taking the more difficult assignments at even strength. Allowing Shattenkirk to be more creative against weaker match ups.

It will be interesting to see how the remaining holes on the blue line are plugged. The Blues strongly favor mixed pairs. A left handed and right handed shot paired. An offensively skilled defenseman with a defensive minded one. Could this open the door to move Carlo Colaiacovo? A player who’s salary may price him past the role he is best suited (3rd pairing offensive specialist) and force a trade. If Armstrong spends just a little more in payroll could Ian Cole or (the rights to) Nikita Niktin be part of a package to land an upgrade to the veteran presence and keep Colaiacovo?

With more RFA’s to sign and the draft looming, its too difficult to tell what Armstrong will do to address needs. One hole was for sure filled today. Polak will be solidifying the Blues defensive efforts for years to come.

Hear more thoughts from Armstrong in an audio clip on the Blues website.

-

In other Restricted Free Agent news, reports indicate forward Vladimir Sobotka has agreed to, but is yet to sign, a three year deal worth an expected $3.9 million ($1.3 million AAV).

Sobotka was acquired from the Boston Bruins for prospect defenseman David Warsofsky last summer. In his first season with the Blues, the Czech Republic native registered 7 goals and posted 29 points in 65 games.

Sobe was a super sub for the Note. Freely moving up and down the left wing and center positions. Primarily considered and utilized as a energy and/or checking line center, Sobotka moonlighted on the top line with David Backes throughout the season.

Three years feels a little long for a role playing forward, but his ability to step up in to the skill lines and show chemistry (and produce) make the bet worth taking. His hockey sense and understanding of game flow and where to be and when is one of the strongest on the team. Having plug and play skaters like him is how teams like the Pittsburgh Penguins survived dramatic personnel losses. Building more depth in that direction is always a positive.

-

While the Berglund deal was rumored and covered by the media over the last few weeks, the news today came as a surprise. Which RFA becomes the focus next is anyones best guess, but may offer a glimpse in to the off season plan.

The short list includes:
TJ Oshie
Matt D’Agostini
BJ Crombeen
Ryan Reaves
Nick Drazenovic
TJ Hensick
Nikita Nikitin
Ben Bishop

Speculation persists that D’Agostini is looking for / will most likely get a 1 year contract. Given that Sobotka’s salary nearly doubled, the same can be expected for the former Hab. Anywhere from $1.5 to $2.0 million would be a fair one year price. If the deal goes to a two year term, $3.0 million total, say $1.3 and $1.7 respectively, would be a reasonable price.

Expect the Oshie trade rumors to run wild if D’Agostini does sign before fan favorite number 74.

A few UFA forwards may sign soon as well. Specifically Chris Porter and Adam Cracknell. Two depth forwards who had respectable seasons with the Blues AHL affiliate, the Peoria Rivermen, and filled their 4th line positions well in the last month or so of the season. Likely earning similar spots for 11-12 should they chose to stay in St. Louis.

Keep an eye on Bishop signing. If he does as Andy Strickland suggests, takes a one year, one way deal around $500,000 the free agency plan is likely to spend on improving depth and experience simultaneously. At both forward and in the “top 4 defenseman” position opening created by the departure of Eric Brewer. If they go the veteran backup route again, someone like a Johan Hedberg per se, they will add skaters “on the cheap”.

-

Thanks for reading. As always, you’re welcome to follow me on Twitter: @618_STLBlues & @BlueNoteZone.

True North announced that they have bought the Atlanta Thrashers and will bring “Canada’s Game” home to Winnipeg, Manitoba. Fans in the frozen north are elated to have NHL hockey back after over a decade without. But Thrasher fans are losing their team. Inept ownership and management withstanding, no fan base deserves to lose “their team”

At least Gary Bettman wants you, the money spending puckheads of North America, to think.

Many of which reside in St. Louis and bleed blue for their Blues. One of several other NHL franchises currently in ownership transition. Who absorb today’s news and wonder if a Game Plan LLC doesn’t find a buyer for Dave Checketts and TowerBrook Capital Partners soon, that they will be the next “to not lose their team”.

As the great fantasy writer Robert Jordan wrote, ” The Wheel weaves as the Wheel wills and we are only the thread of the Pattern”.

With the inconsistencies in issue handling by the league, specifically comparing Phoenix to Atlanta, there is only hope that should the Note end up on the Wheel of Relocation that ownership groups from Hamilton, Seattle or Saskatchewan are not chosen over league intervention.

If Jordan’s words are taken in one direction, that what will be will be and no mortal soul can prevent it, then a bumpy ride await those who live and die with the 44 year old club. However, threads do not always go where they were intended. One finished product has slight variations from its predecessor and the next to follow will have its quirks.

Bottom line is, there is no stopping the process, but the outcomes can be different with.

What does this mean?

The Blues are not the Coyotes, nor are they the Thrashers. There is tremendous fan support in St. Louis. Whether or not big ticket promotions and fuzzy math are used to create and determine sellouts, there are sellouts. Not just when the big fish come in to the little pond. The Blues sold out all 41 home games this past season. in 2009-10 they were at 98.6 capacity.

Support just isn’t in the seats, its on couches too. In November 2010 they broke a 10 year old record with a 5.6 HH Rating in St. Louis. Their figures throughout the season continued to be the strongest in years. In April the St. Louis Post Dispatch reported as such.

The Blues fizzled again, continuing their long string of malaise. They haven’t won a playoff game since 2004, haven’t won a postseason series since 2002 and were out of realistic Stanley Cup contention for more than a month. They don’t even have a marquee player — no Blue was in the top 38 in scoring in the league.

But still their fans proved to be a resilient bunch, not only turning out in droves for home games but sending the team to its best TV rating ever on cable/satellite.

Also impressive: The rating was fifth-best rating by any U.S.-based NHL team, and the four above them made the playoffs.

According to The Nielsen Co., 3.1 percent of homes in the market tuned in on average to Blues telecasts on Fox Sports Midwest, the second year that outlet has been the sole provider of the team’s local TV coverage. The previous record was 2.9, set in 1995-96 — when the Blues began utilizing cable. Games then were on Prime Sports, FSM’s predecessor.

There is a relative ease of access that certainly helps.

The business end of the Blues is a fairly well run machine. The staff fans are in contact with, primarily sales reps, are very easy to deal with. Combine a solid staff with the glutton of ticket offers and folks are generally willing to buy.

There are no endlessly congested highways leading to long drive times for Blues fans. They aren’t making a hike to Glendale or fighting Atlanta’s infamous traffic. They’re driving relatively efficient interstates and taking the Metro Link light rail system that is designed to funnel commuters in to downtown (from Illinois as well). Mind you it drops off riders right across the street from the Scottrade Center. No long, unsafe walk required.

While Fox Sports Mid West has had its squabbles with a few important Satellite/Cable/Telco providers, the network is on almost everyones basic package and most standard HD packages.

If someone wants to see the Blues its very easy process.

Surely the league loves the support found with a mid market club struggling to make the playoffs. Imagine what could happen if they actually made the second season on a consistent basis. So long as support stays strong there is little chance that the wheel lands near the Thrashers outcome. Just as long as the foot doesn’t come off the gas pedal of fan support.

Blues Sign Berglund to Two Year Deal

According to the Blues official website, stlouisblues.com, Restricted Free Agent Center Patrik Berglund has agreed to a two year contract extension.

The deal appears for an AAV of $2.25 million. Paying $2.1 in 2011-12 and 2.4 million in 2012-13. He will still be a RFA at the conclusion of the contract.

Any speculation on dealing Berglund is now dead. However, talk of trading TJ Oshie will likely heat up. At least among fans and media. Especially if the conversation hasn’t begun by the draft.

In an interesting change of operating procedure, the Blues will make the media conference call available online tomorrow.

Fans will be able to watch Berglund’s media conference call live on Wednesday at noon at stlouisblues.com. Fan questions for Berglund can be submitted by clicking here and may be asked during Wednesday’s conference call.

In three seasons with the Blues the Vesteras, Sweden native has appeared in 228 games. Registering 56 goals and 125 points. Last season he set career highs in Goals (22) and Points (52). In the recently concluded 2011 IIHF World Championships Berglund tallied 8 goals and 10 points in 9 games. A key figure in Sweden’s Silver Medal effort.

As first reported by Seren Rosso on Twitter and then by Chesnokov, Vladimir Tarasenko has elected to stay in the KHL for the 2011-12 season.

Anticipation has been building in St. Louis for the arrival of the captain of the 2011 IIHF World Junior Championship’s U-20 Gold Medal Russia squad since he was selected 16th overall in the 2010 NHL Entry Draft. The rare blend of size, speed, power, finesse, deft hands, a high work ethic and will to win have the blue bleeding faithful salivating over the potential gamebreaker to be. Comparisons to top 2 picks Taylor Hall and Tyler Seguin only fanned the flames.

Such high evaluation is not a fan creation. The front office has the same feelings, although far less gushy, for the one called “Tank”. Former Assistant GM and Amateur Scouting Director Jarmo Kekalainen convinced then GM Larry Pleau (and GM in waiting Doug Armstrong) at the draft to trade their 2009 1st round pick, David Rundblad, to Ottawa to take Tarasenko. A notable shift in personnel philosophy for an ownership era where prospect acquisition had been at a premium. Add in the comments made by Armstrong throughout the the second half of the season pointed to the Blues taking all (legal) means possible to bring Tarasenko over and reading between the lines is very easy to do.

Tarasenko is something special.

Given the organization’s desire and the pro-NHL” comments made by Tarasenko around the draft and subsequently throughout the 2010-11 season, his arrival in St. Louis appeared to be a foregone conclusion. Still, confirmation was needed. Last week Chesnokov reported that the decision would be made after a vacation following the World Championships.

Time was taken. The decision was made to stay close to home for one more year.

However, the outcome was not for trying on the part of the Blues. As Chesnokov tweeted Tuesday morning:

Sibir GM tells SovSport the Blues made an “exclusive offer” to Tarasenko “like no other…guaranteeing he’d play.”

(*For the record, Armstrong has denied this report.)

While there has been an obvious shift in team building under Armstrong’s watch as the Blues transition out of their deep rebuild, such an offer is a 180 degree flip from the standard set with previous highly touted first round picks like Erik Johnson, Alex Pietrangelo and David Perron. Patrik Berglund and Lars Eller were given no such offer, that is known of, to encourage their defection from the SEL. The same can be said of TJ Oshie and Ian Cole from the NCAA ranks. There is really no precedent set for that type of offer

Tarasenko’s importance to the Blues off season plans is now very apparent.

Volva was to be a key acquisition. Representing more than just a number of goals and points added to next season’s projections. He would bring a high talent level to the depth chart. As injuries showed throughout the 10-11 season, the Blues simply do not have enough NHL level skill in their available resources to compete for a playoff position. Tarasenko offered a cost effective option allowing more payroll dollars to be spent on other areas of need. Putting the Blues in a much stronger position to survive the ups and downs of the 82 game marathon at a critical juncture in the franchise’s history.

All worries aside, overreaction is premature and irresponsible. Armstrong likely moves to “Plan B” to address his needs. If any GM in the Blues history has exuded the confidence that he can make a big pitcher of lemonade, Army is that man. What he will do is a discussion for another blog.

No, Tarasenko is not a “bust”. Nor is he “Filatov v2.0″. There is no fault for staying for an additional season with Sibir. He agreed to a two year contract with the club his father coaches. The 11-12 season will fulfill that contract and allow him to walk away with clean hands. As for the heavily rumored out clause, there may have such strict requirements that the best decision was to wait for its expiration.

Concern over Tarasenko’s development is understandable, but founded in stereotypical misconception. He will continue to compete against some of the top talent in the world. He is no worse off in the KHL than he is taking bus tours across North America in the AHL.

Without more contractual details surfacing, there is just no way to discern if Tarasenko wasn’t able to extraicate himself from his contract or if he was “lying” about his dream to play in the NHL.

Chesnokov offers one more nugget of info in a tweet that may shed some light on what may come to pass after next season.

Sibir GM to Sovsport about the Blues’ offer to Tarasenko: “We had no idea the Blues wanted [Tarasenko] to come so bad. But it’d be better for him to play 1 more year in Russia before moving to the NHL.“

Sounds like an expectation of eventual loss for one hockey club and gain for another across the globe.

In other prospect news

Speculation at the conclusion of the regular season pointed to Colorado College forward and the Blues top selection in the 2010 draft, Jaden Schwartz, jumping out of the NCAA ranks and heading up to the WHL. A definitive answer seems to have come Monday morning. The Colorado Springs Gazette reported that Schwartz confirmed via text to the Gazette Sunday that he will return for his sophomore year.

Speaking of Tarasenko’s club Sibir, they have added another Blues prospect. Finnish playmaker Jori Lehtera.

News of Lehtera’s defection from Lokomotiv to Sibir for the final season of his two year KHL contract came just one day after Tarasenko’s decision delaying announcement. Fueling tinfoil hat conjecture that Lehtera’s acquisition is meant to cover the loss Tarasenko. Tuesday’s announcement has proven such speculation false.

Many in St. Louis wrote off the former SM-liiga scoring champion when he chose Russia over the US. While, potentially hasty in hindsight, there is no information suggesting a change of heart. Unless Lehtera has a “break out” season. There doesn’t appear to be a Ville Leino scenario to play out.

—

Thanks for reading. As always you’re welcome to follow me on Twitter: @618_STLBlues and @BlueNoteZone.

For all those invested in the St. Louis Blues, they’ve got that feeling.

On Wednesday evening reports surfaced that Principal Owner Dave Checketts would be stepping aside to do the right thing. Post the “For Sale” Sign at the corner of 14th and Clark since he was unable to secure the investors to replace departing Majority Owner TowerBrook Capital Partners. Confirming what many assumed to be the eventual outcome. That a 100% stake in the St. Louis Blues, Scottrade Center and the Peoria Rivermen would hit the market.

The reports proved to be true.

In an instant there was an explosion of reaction. Apprehension, frustration, anger, fear. The whole spectrum of emotion flooded message boards, social media, blogs, radio shows and MSM articles. As stated back on March 7th, such sentiments had driven the mood with the fan base since the long awaited ownership update from Jeremy Rutherford on March 5th. The entire scenario was a long time coming. That doesn’t leave anyone feeling any better.

Instead of the closure that everyone hoped for based on Checkett’s self described time lines, they’re left asking what’s next?

To an extent, we already know because this is a road recently traveled. The Blues were up for sale barely five years ago. All the questions posed since Wednesday have all be asked and answered once. All the emotions confronted and dealt with. They key difference this time around, to obtaining a long term owner versus a gap filling, better than the alternative owner, is that the Blues are in an infinitely stronger position in the hockey world in 2011 than they were in 2006.

Checketts inherited a franchise in shambles. The Laurie era left the team with debt on the books and on the depth chart. Few fans filled the seats or watched on TV. The entire operation had to be reconstructed from the ground up. Two key figures were enlisted to tackle the task. John Davidson assumed the position of Team President of Hockey Operations and took over the direction of the on ice product. Peter McLoughlin became CEO of St. Louis Blues Enterprises and took over the business end of the venture. Mike McCarthy may now be the CEO, but McLoughlin’s tenure is where all the positive change has come from. Checkett’s ability to allow Davidson and his CEO’s develop, enact and manage their action plans have made all the difference.

The presumed rise in the standings has yet to occur, but Davidson has amassed one of the deepest groups of untapped talent and potential. Not just self described, but a consensus among pundits and industry professionals around the league. Alex Pietrangelo, Vladimir Tarasenko and Jaroslav Halak are the long term names to bank on. Not Peter Cajanek, Eric Boguniecki, and Peter Sejna. According to Forbes reports the Blues have gone from a revenue of roughly $66 million in 2005-06 and value of $150 million to an estimated revenue in the $78-$80 million range with a team value of $165 million in late 2010. Fuzzy math there may be, but sellouts are announced routinely at Scottrade.

Detracting variables have been converted in to selling points. The heavy lifting is over and done with. The fans came back are as energized and engaged as ever. The cupboards are stocked as well as any home on the block. All the House of Payne needs is a good buyer. Someone who can pay the bills and absorb a little debt to get the team up climbing up the standings while waiting for playoff dollars to come in. A money man is all that’s asked for.

What about the short term needs of the business? The chances that the ownership situation is resolved before the draft or even July 1st are slim to none. General Manager Doug Armstrong will need to continue his retooling of the lineup without the requisite funds to ensure success. There will certainly be some give and take. Instead of holding on to all of the young Restricted Free Agents, one or two could have their rights moved in order to bring in more established replacements.

The future of Matt D’Agostini, Vladimir Sobotka, Nikita Nikitin and Roman Polak may be cloudier now than this time last week. All could be part of packages for a veteran upgrade. Carlo Colaiacovo could be on his way out as well. The third pairing, power play specialist is fighting Nikitin, Ian Cole and Kevin Shattenkirk for ice time and role. All three of which make (or could make) half as much as his $2.5 million salary for 2011-12. Would a team with the need and payroll space to add a one year deal for power play help?

Key RFAs TJ Oshie and Patrik Berglund’s contracts will have to be longer in term if they want to reach a given value.

If there was any question that Ben Bishop would ascend to Halak’s backup, it’s been answered. An older, more costly addition is much less likely with no wiggle room.

Tarasenko has a much better chance to start next season in St. Louis as his dent in the budget would be less than a more experienced “top 9″ forward free agent.

Davis Payne has a better chance at returning behind the bench. Even if management wanted to take the coaching staff in a different direction, to bring in an “established” presence, the money won’t be available. Payne has familiarity and paycheck size on his size.

For those worried about what happens past 2011-12, don’t. The whole process is far too fresh to contemplate the franchise leaving (Checketts has said he “will not let that happen”), the NHL stepping in (ie. Phoenix) or the City of St. Louis getting involved (like Glendale). The status quo remains in effect till a buyer is found. The same programs funneling in the crowds and breaking even will stay constant. Hopefully the projected growth of the young core comes to fruition and further strengthens the product for purchase.

For now, we wait to see history play out. The story could go either way. Repeating dark chapters or blazing a new path in a new era of St. Louis Blues hockey.

-

As always you’re welcome to follow me on Twitter: @618_STLBlues and @BlueNoteZone

The result was disturbing. Flashbacks to young Mikael Tam are understandable.

Click here to view the embedded video.

Instead of battling for the position and run the risk of taking a 2 minute minor for interference or getting back to a center position defensively, supporting pairing partner Johnny Boychuck who was already retrieving the puck, the 6’9 behemoth of a hockey player forced Pacioretty in to no man’s land. Using his size and brute strength advantage to edge a much smaller opponent in to an incredibly dangerous end game. A train about to run out of track and slam in to the mountain side.

Habs fans can yell and scream that the intent to injure is clear. Bruins fans can counter with “he isn’t that kind of player”. Let’s just call a spade, a spade. While doubtful Chara intended to injure Pacioretty in the nature he did, Big Z made a woefully reckless decision. The wrong decision.

A decision to “send a message” to a long time, bitter rival.

Since when is risking serious injury to a peer that could end their career (and possibly their life) the right scenario to “send the message”? If such risk is “required” to ensure delivery, is it truly worth sending?

No, it’s not. It takes not just a higher level of common sense, but a real respect for the game and those who play it to see why.

The lack of respect is not limited to Chara, the Bruins, the NHL or hockey in general. Permeating everyday life, homes and work places, are choices and actions that lack a fundamental respect for someone not yourself. In the high stakes and high speed game the NHL has created following the lockout, more attention comes their way because the outcome can be catastrophic.

Existence of the problem outside the league doesn’t preclude responsibility. Everyone from coaches to the players understand the changes to the game. Their livelihood depends on knowing it inside and out. Yet, some cannot seem to help themselves. The temptation to grab a purse left on a bench is too much to resist.

They know they shouldn’t hit the guy with his back turned, but they do it anyways.

Trevor Gilles on Eric Tangradi.
Matt Cooke on Marc Savard.
Sean Avery on anybody.
Chris Pronger stomping on legs.
Ryan Hollweg boarding Alex Peitrangelo in a pre-season game.
Jordin Tootoo sucker punching Ryan Reaves.
Cam Janssen on Matt Bradley.

The list goes on and on. Players that don’t seem to care about the repercussions of their actions. All’s fair in love and war is their mantra.

Those are the usual suspects though. The greatest risk seems to now come from bad decisions like Chara’s, not calculated attacks.

Andy Sutton boarding Pascal Dupuis.
Alex Ovechkin kneeing Sergei Gonchar.
Ryan Getzlaf slewfooting Barret Jackman.
Mike Richards on David Booth.

How many times have we seen skates poked out from under someone when contesting an icing? How many cross-checks in the back in to the boards with extended arms (like Steve Montador on James Neal Tuesday)?

There is no longer a problem with a sub-culture in the NHL. A few skilled skaters with ulterior motives and goons at the end of the bench barley seeing 5 minutes a night on the ice with one thing on their mind. The lack of respect is now part of THE culture of the NHL. The pace of the game and size of the players the scapegoat.

There can be no excuse when careers and lives are at stake. If the league and union are serious about protecting players, Chara must be suspended.

Is it a Gillies level offense? Even with questionable circumstances (the score, team history, time of game), it’s not. At least in intent. In the final result, Pacioretty’s injury, it’s close. Does it compare to a Rick Rypien level of thoughtless action? Probably, just with far more dire consequences. Gillies received a nine game suspension and Rypien earned six games off.

Does Chara fit in the middle with a seven or eight game suspension? Leaving that question to Mike Murphy. Although, Bob McKenzie makes a solid argument for a two game suspension.

The slippery slope arguments about ruining the game and removing hitting need not apply. Curtailing dangerous hits along the boards (and promoting better decision making) won’t prevent the big, clean hit. Like Mike Weaver on Patrick Sharp or Marc Staal on Matt Stajan. It will prevent guys going headlong on to the boards.

We’ll all find out Wednesday what will be Chara’s fate. Surely, very few will like it. Maybe that means they’ll get it right.

-

As always, you are invited to follow @618_STLBlues and @BlueNoteZone on Twitter.

All adjectives correctly describing the mood in St. Louis Blues nation. As if the injuries, trades, more injuries and seemingly heartless efforts on the ice weren’t enough for the always emotionally charged fan base to deal with, they woke to another reminder on Saturday morning that the root cause of their pain won’t be fixed by the doctor any time soon.

Jeremy Rutherford of the St. Louis Post Dispatch delivered an update on the Blues ownership situation as promised. For the last 6 to 8 weeks the Blues most prominent beat writer had mentioned on more than one occasion that managing (and minority) owner Dave Checketts (of SCP Worldwide) would have to answer questions if another “soft deadline” passed in his bid to obtain new investors to replace divesting majority investor TowerBrook Capital Partners (TCP). The first such date was the end of 2010. Just before that time table passed Checketts offered that the ownership group was 95% complete and would be presented at the Board of Governers meeting during the All Star festivities. No proposal was brought before the league.

Checketts has yet to comment after a month of waiting, but a few tidbits of information have been made available.

Fellow minority owner Tom Stillman has made a bid to purchase the Blues outright from SCP and TCP. As described by Rutherford, “His investment group includes a couple of “heavy hitters,” according to sources, and also has strong St. Louis connections.” Though his connections are strong, the bid has been rejected by Checketts since it fell below the estimated value of the franchise. The search continues for investors to allow for TCP’s divestiture.

Local radio personality and hockey blogger Andy Strickland chimed in Saturday as well. Adding that Stillman may have St. Louis Cardinals President Bill DeWitt III and former Blues forward Jim Campbell in his corner. Also confirming the rejected offer and stating that SCP/TCP are looking for a buyout in the Buffalo Sabres range of $189 million.

What can be gleaned from these updates (from which I am condensing and suggest both be read in their entirety)?

- Checketts is having understandable difficulty lining up investors to sign checks as a silent partner in a venture not likely to break a profit.

- TCP has a large influence in the process since they are the controlling stake and have put no timetable on their departure. Other than they intend to as soon as Checketts can reorganize.

- If the ownership group truly was 95% complete as of December 30th, there appears to be a falling out between Checketts and Stillman. To what level, is unclear. If it was not 95% complete, then a whole other can of worms opens.

- The current financial landscape is not a “seller’s market”, therefore SCP and TCP are not comfortable selling out completely unless their preferred value is met.

- Buyers will want in at a low price of entry to pad losses they are for sure to encounter. Meaning the preferred value will not likely be met soon.

Basically, everyone is caught between a rock and a concrete wall. The team cannot be sold for the desired amount and finding an influx of financial support to elevate the franchise above it’s current level looks to be improbable.

The cause for concern is palpable.

If one axiom has been proved to be true over the last few seasons, a cap floor scraping payroll budget (of say $44 to $45 million) will not cut it in the NHL. A team just cannot compete under that condition unless they’re lucky enough to avoid the injury bug from October to April. There just isn’t enough depth to a lineup constructed on such a tight allotment of funds. No change to the ownership situation means the team stays as is. Waiting (hoping better describes) for someone to catch lightning in a bottle and carry the team to new heights.

Color the blue bleeding supporters who’ve sold out virtually ever home game this season (and countless others in the previous two) skeptical. The same song and dance they’ve seen and heard before. The wait and see mantra can only sedate the taste for blood for so long. The call for change is strong. One method has been tested and has failed to deliver. Time to start keeping up with the Jones’.

Doug Armstrong has certainly looked like the one to proliferate new ideas and bring the train out of the tunnel. Many believe he still can (myself included), but are forced to question if he will have the tools available to continue his transformation of the Blues. This latest round of ownership news suggests he won’t. Even with his purging of Brad Boyes salary, he’ll barely be able to work in the raises due to RFAs Roman Polak, TJ Oshie, Patrik Berglund, Vladimir Sobotka Matt D’Agostini while still addressing the remaining seven holes in the lineup that must be filled.

The lack of wiggle room likely puts on hold any plans to add veteran leadership, which will come at a premium starting July 1st. Andy McDonald and Barret Jackman are excellent starting points for an older core of personalities in the locker room. They are as well respected as any battle tested warrior. However, they have proven to be not enough of a counter balance against the youthful dominance demographically. Don’t forget that many older players seek contracts that stabilize their family. How much of a deterrent will an unstable ownership group be? Too much for the kind of players the Blues need to court.

Will Armstrong be able to fully realize his vision what he wants the Blues to be on the ice? Certainly all of his wheeling and dealing in the last few weeks was aimed at making this summer all about obtaining the personnel that he thinks can win games and compete for a playoff birth. A plan in jeopardy because he may not be have clearance to pay the players he acquires with all of the trade capital he has amassed.

Perhaps the most important question comes back to the fans. Will they continue to support this team if they see further stagnation? Can the consistent negative PR be overcome with more heavily discounted ticket programs? Will fans continue to buy in to that philosophy?

Sadly, all roads lead to more questions without answers.

The Checketts regime is greatly appreciated for keeping a tradition alive in St. Louis. Because of him, hockey persevered in the gateway city. No one expects him to take a loss, but at what point does his involvement producing diminishing returns. If the product on the ice can’t win becuase the funding isn’t available, the crowds will dwindle. Lowering the value to greater depths. Sometimes taking the best offer is the best thing to do. Looking like that mark has been hit.

-

As always, you are invited to follow @618_STLBlues and @BlueNoteZone on Twitter.

Former Blues Forward Brad Boyes - Image via TSN Photography (BlueNoteZone.com)

It’s not just bad weather blowing around St. Louis. The trade winds have kicked up once again around 14th and Clark as Doug Armstrong sends another prominent rebuild era fixture packing. Trading right winger Brad Boyes to the Buffalo Sabres in exchange for a 2nd Round pick in the 2011 draft.

The Blues obtained the former Maple Leaf first round pick in a deal with the Boston Bruins back in 2007. Sending offensive defenseman Dennis Wideman in return. In the between time Boyes has accumulated 108 goals and 232 points in 326 games. In 2007-08 he set a career high mark in goals (43) and in 2008-09 a career high in points (72). Much like the Note, he has fallen upon hard times since the epic dash to the 2009 playoff birth. Scoring just 26 goals in 143 games (.18 Goals/Game). A far cry from his previous pace 76 goals in 164 games (.46 Goals/Game).

Given the growth of TJ Oshie and the acquisition of Chris Stewart a log jam was created on the wing and Boyes became expendable. His slippage in level of play and production certainly increased his chances of being moved, but this has been a move a long time coming. Not just in the context of this season’s trade deadline, but in general.

When Boyes agreed to a 4-year, $16 million contract in 2008, he became the go to guy. Bringing offensive skill at a manageable financial burden. Giving the Blues room to grow and supplement the lineup. It would also mean that in due time, he would be a tradeable asset. As key rebuilding pieces like Oshie, David Perron, Patrik Berglund and Lars Eller (at the time) developed in to legitimate professionals and took over key roles, Boyes could be moved to restock the prospect cupboard that was so diligently built over the last 5 years. The contract just so happened to have one year left when Oshie and Berglund’s ECLs expired.

His value may have dwindled down to warranting just a second round pick coming as compensation for his services, but the other “unintended consequence” remains intact. The Blues are no longer on the hook for his remaining $900,000 (roughly) this season and his $4 million for 2011-12. Savings that can be used to offset losses today and retain (and even add) needed personnel for tomorrow.

The Blues aren’t done yet. Monday will likely bring another move or two. Who will that be? We’ll just have to wait and see what tricks Army has up he sleeve.

Over the course of the last few weeks I’ve fielded my fair share Blues related trade deadline questions. While the method of delivery varies, there are general themes are consistent throughout. With one day and a few hours to go, I hope to address many of these issues and provide some clarity as to what blue bleeders across St. Louis Blues nation should expect Monday.

Is there a better way to take many similar queries and condense them in to one easy to reference guide than a FAQ? I think not. On to the questions.

-

Q. Are the Blues Buyers or Sellers?

Whether or not the Blues would be classified or buyers or sellers is an interesting question because they are truly both.

Buyers in the sense that if assets or personnel need to be moved to obtain assets or personnel that better fit the model Doug Armstrong is going forward with, Dave Checketts seems to be giving the green light. Sellers in the sense that there are players that simply do not factor in to the plans for 2011-12 and beyond. Those will be sold off to the highest bidder.

Q. Who are the potential rentals?

Brad Winchester: The 29 year old left winger is a a soon to be UFA with 5 season’s of NHL experience. Some advancements in his game have been seen this season, he hasn’t been able to full replicate his 13 goals in 64 game performance in 2008-09. He would bring size, grit, abrasiveness, and a scoring touch to a contender’s bottom six.

Cam Janssen: The local boy from Eureka, MO came home in a deadline deal three years ago when the New Jersey Devils moved Cam for Defenseman Bryce Salvador. For a team looking to add a seasoned fighter, he’s a guy to take a look at. That said, he isn’t the antagonist he once was. His style of game has changed.

Ty Conklin: The 34 year old career backup goaltender has plenty of experience to share with a team jockeying for playoff position. Around for back to back Stanley Cup Finals runs with Pittsburgh in 2008 and Detroit in 2009, he could be an upgrade over less battle hardened backups. The market for Conklin appears to be low given his placement on waivers Saturday. If he clears waivers on Monday, there will be a small window of time to move him.

Q. Who is Untouchable?

There are very few untouchables. The short list includes, Jaroslav Halak, David Backes, TJ Oshie, David Perron, Alex Steen, Alex Pietrangelo, Chris Stewart and Kevin Shattenkirk. Some are just straight up untouchable (like Oshie and Backes) and others won’t bring back the return needed to justify their departure (like Steen and Shattenkirk). All fitting Armstrong’s plan for 11-12.

There is a secondary set of players that the Blues likely don’t want to move, but could for the right asking price. Another short list including Roman Polak, Andy McDonald, Patrik Berglund, Barret Jackman, and Carlo Colaiacovo.

As far as prospects go, don’t expect there to be offers for 2010 first round selections Jaden Schwartz and Vladimir Tarasenko. Both are highly valued inside the organization and aren’t for sale.

Q. Can they add salary?

Yes, they could. To the tune of a little more than $1 million in remaining pay.

Will they? Not likely. Armstorong’s mandate seems to be add bodies for tomorrow without adding more payroll today.

Q. Will Brad Boyes be traded?

I’ve stated for nearly two years that I doubt that Brad Boyes would play out his final year of his 4 year, $16 million deal in St. Louis. As building blocks like Oshie and Perron developed, Boyes would become expendable. His role could be adequately filled by the maturing core prospects and his value would bring back assets to replenish the coffers.

His production is returning to acceptable levels following a season and two months of struggle, rebuilding some of value. His $ 4 million in salary can be reinvested in to addressing a key need, like a top pairing left handed defenseman.

If a buyer can be found for an respectable return, Boyes will be dealt.

Q. Who could be trade bait?

Addressing major needs via free agency doesn’t seem to be in the cards for the Blues. The money isn’t there to wade in to the open market waters and fight to sign watered down options at inflated prices. If a “major impact player” will be added, it will come via trade. A scenario that could play out Monday. In the post lock out / salary cap era, team building deals seem to get done more in the summer than in February.

The Stewart and Shattenkirk deal seems to diverge from the norm. If Armstrong did it once, its possible to do it again.

Secondary core players like Berglund and Polak are possibilities since they are both RFAs this summer. Boyes, Colaiacovo or McDonald could all be involved in “hockey trades” to bring back comparable personnel in other areas. Keep in mind that Berglund’s name came up at the draft regarding the potential trade of Keith Ballard and McDonald’s name has come up in connection with the Washington Capitals and a few other Eastern Conference clubs. Someone like Jeff Schultz comes to mind as potential compensation.

Ian Cole’s name always seems to come up in discussion. Unless he is part of a deal like the one with the Avalanche, he is staying put. Cast away thoughts of his inclusion in a far fetched Zach Parise scheme. The same can be said of Phil McRae and Jake Allen.

Jonas Junland’s name comes up as well. The AHL stud who walked away from a NHL job to return to Sweden has little to no trade value unless he returns to the NHL. Since that won’t happen till 2011-12, he has no impact on this deadlines deals.

Q. How will the ownership instability alter deadline activity?

Beyond the obvious, rolling back payroll, there will likely be little impact. Taking in to account the Blues won’t get a white knight riding in like Buffalo did with Terry Pegula, a solid ownership group still wouldn’t be adding payroll in a mad dash for the playoffs. A few tweaks here and there would have come, but nothing along the lines of an additional $2 -$4 million or more.

An example would be the addition (or the potential) of Jamie Langenbrunner.

-

There are likely more questions out there. Bring them for Monday morning’s Trade Deadline show. I’ll be there with the rest of the Hockey Independent crew breaking down the deals.

-

As always, you are invited to follow @618_STLBlues and @BlueNoteZone on Twitter

Ty Conklin - Image via TSN Photography (BlueNoteZone.com)

Conklin On Waivers

As initially reported by Bob McKenzie of TSN and Kevin Allen of USA Today, the St. Louis Blues have placed backup netminder Ty Conklin on waivers. While the move has yet to be confirmed by the Blues, through the local media or on their website, it’s safe to assume that Conklin’s days have passed in St. Louis.

It’s little secret that the doors at 14th & Clark have been open to business this trading season. Though the kickoff sale was done Black Friday style back in the wee hours between February 18th and 19th.

Doug Armstrong’s move’s have come with a clear agenda. Clear out payroll (like Eric Brewer), obtain whatever assets possible for impending Unrestricted Free Agents (again, like Brewer), and acquire personnel that fit in to the re-tooling model (Chris Stewart and Kevin Shattenkirk). Since the trade market was likely thin for backups, adding assets or personnel wasn’t an option with the journeyman. The waiver wire still allows Armstrong to cut payroll.

Replacing Conklin with third year pro Ben Bishop, who stopped 39 shots en route to his first NHL shutout Friday night, saves roughly $96,000 for the remainder of the 2010-11 season. Small peanuts to some teams, but for cash strapped and tightly budgeted organization like the Blues, any savings are good savings.

This move wouldn’t be possible if not for Jaroslav Halak’s immanent return to the lineup. Who has been out with a hand injury since the 15th and also caused him to him a few games earlier in the month.

Where will Conklin go? That is a the question.

Andy Strickland indicated that he may not be heading to the Blues AHL affiliate in Peoria. Heading down another Manny Legace type scenario are we? Not really. I have a feeling Ty takes the news better than Manny did.

There is a reasonable possibility that he is claimed. The Buffalo Sabres, Toronto Maple Leafs and the Carolina Hurricanes come to mind as teams flirting with the playoffs who might have (backup) goaltending needs to address. Carolina would be my darkhorse pick to slip in a claim. Cam Ward will certainly carry the load in Raleigh, but Conklin could be seen as a significant upgrade over the inexperienced Justin Peters. The Canes are currently three points ahead of Buffalo in the fight for 8th place in the Eastern Conference. Any additional padding that may save a point here or there, like a veteran netminder holding the fort down for an overtime loss instead of a regulation loss, may be what keeps them above the water line.

As I have written before, all bets are off.

Perron Sees Specialist in Vancouver

Concussed forward David Perron made the road trip with the Blues to western Canada this weekend. At least for the initial stop in Vancouver. As reported by the St. Louis Post Dispatch, Perron traveled to see Dr. Don Grant. A concussion specialist who treated fellow Blues forward Andy McDonald. There is still no timetable for David’s return, his comments to Post scribe Jeremy Rutherford seem upbeat and progressive. Perron hasn’t ruled out playing this season, but the safe bet (pun intended) is that rest and rehabilitation is prescribed for the balance of the season. There is never a need to “rush” back from concussion. Especially given that the Blues are very much on the outside of the playoff bubble.

- – -

Update: Rutherford was able to confirm the move with Armstrong this afternoon. He quoted Armstrong as saying, “We just felt that there was opportunity to see if a team wants Ty for the rest of the season, and if that occurs, then it’s an opportunity for Ben Bishop.”

Bank on Bishop starting in Calgary Sunday. The Blues are off Monday but are back in action Tuesday, March 1st against Calgary back in St. Louis for a delayed home and home set. Who starts Tuesday is up in the air.

-

As always, you are invited to follow @618_STLBlues and @BlueNoteZone on Twitter

What about the financial impact? Both of these franchises are cap floor scrapers. Working on a budget well below the $59.4 million upper limit. For a team like the Blues, in ownership/investor limbo, keeping the books lean and on target to pre-season projections is important.

Addressing personnel needs and maintaining a competitive lineup are also important.

In the two deals General Manager Doug Armstrong struck last week, he found a nice balance of both worlds. Moving a costly salary that would not be returning for next season (Eric Brewer to Tampa Bay) and reinvesting payroll dollars from areas of depth in to areas of need (Erik Johnson and Jay McClement to Colorado for Chris Stewart and Kevin Shattenkirk).

Below is a breakdown of the expenses coming in, going out and the remaining balance. As a point of reference Blues operate on roughly a $45 million payroll. Capgeek.com estimates the figure at season end to be approximately $45,289,510.

Salaries In

Chris Stewart – $2.5 million ($3.25 million in 2011-12)
Kevin Shattenkirk – $875,000 ($875,000 in 2011-12)
Total: $3.375 million

According to Capgeek, the figures remaining to be paid for each player as of 2-22-11.

Stewart – $726,478
Shattenkirk – $227,419
Total: $953,897

Salaries Out

Erik Brewer – $4.5 million
Erik Johnson – $ 2.2 million ($3.0 million in 2011-12)
Jay McClement – $1.45 million ($1.45 million in 2011-12)
Total: $8.15 million

According to Capgeek, the figures remaining to be paid for each player as of 2-22-11.

Brewer – $1,073,925 million
Johnson – $656,989
McClement – $366,398
Total: $2,097,312 million

Total Difference 2010-11: $2,097,312 – $953,897 = $1,143,415
Total Difference 2011-12: $4.125 million – $4.45 million = -$325,000

Basically the Blues can afford to add salary in the total of $1,143,415 and not raise payroll above the $45 million or so that was expected per no trades being made from the original roster. A salary that would be in the Brad Boyes and Andy McDonald raise. Somewhere in the $4.0 million+ in Annual Average Value (AAV) range.

Taking in to account that the Blues were comfortable adding the prorated amounts of Marek Svatos and Kyle Wellwood, it’s not a far jump to figuree they could add about $204,000 to $205,000 in prorated salary. Looking at a $700,000 (pretty much halfway between both deals) divided by 82 games times the remaining schedule of 24 games yields the $204,000 estimate.

Can the Blues bring in a legitimate impact player for this season and beyond for a prorated amount of ($1,143,415 + $204,878 =) $1,348,023? Sure they could. That’s means about a little less than $5.0 million AAV could be comfortably added.

The question now is, will they? Only Doug Armstrong and Dave Checketts can really answer that question. Bottom line, the Blues do have some room to add.

Who knows? That near million in savings may be needed to offset the “Every Game Counts” losses if they finish out of the playoffs. Hopefully that is not the case and Armstrong can continue to remold this roster in his image.

-

As always, you are invited to follow @618_STLBlues and @BlueNoteZone on Twitter