Mission Accomplished, So Far…
Al Cimaglia | Jan 18, 2010 | Comments 8
It might be too soon to say the student has become the teacher but the Blackhawks have now come away with three straight wins over the Red Wings.
This time Detroit had more big guns back in the lineup and probably deserved a better fate. Both teams were playing their third game in four nights and the older Wings came up with a spirited effort especially in the third period.
One main factor which can’t be discounted is the game was far more important to the Wings than the Hawks. This effort from Detroit would have beaten most teams and Chicago won the contest only because they had the better goal keeper.
Antti Niemi was sensational. The Wings know now he is very difficult to beat low.
Detroit still has a potent puck possession attack and a fast transition game to match a solid defensive structure. The Hawks are not in awe of the Wings any longer but they know their place. Until proven otherwise the Red Wings are the team to beat if the Hawks want to advance to the Stanley Cup finals.
Most Hawks fans would be leery of an opening round playoff matchup against the Red Wings. In many ways I would love to watch a series between the two but it probably is unlikely to happen in the first round.
If the Blackhawks tend to their knitting they should finish first or second in the Western Conference. The Red Wings have a great chance of making the playoffs and not being in the bottom two slots.
Injuries are the great equalizer. Brent Sopel suffered an arm injury on Sunday and the severity is not yet known.
But if neither team is beset by injuries the Wings and Hawks should be able to avoid each other in the opening round. The Wings still have a lot of skill and are too well coached; my feeling is they will safely make the playoffs.
I have more to say about the screwed up call in the Dallas-Detroit shootout from Saturday afternoon in Al’s Shots.
Saturday in Columbus
The Blackhawks started their road trip with a sporadic effort but it led to an entertaining 6-5 victory.
The Hawks dominated much of the first and third periods and out battled the Blue Jackets in a game which wasn’t well played. For one of the only times this season Cristobal Huet received a lot of goal support from his teammates and he needed it. Huet wasn’t at his best, but neither was Steve Mason. The Columbus goal keeper looked absolutely lost at times.
The Jackets got into a loose fast paced game with the deeper more skillful Hawks. Not the best idea especially when the Columbus scoring attack is basically only two lines deep.
In the end it was the Hawks power play which bailed them out. Jonathan Toews scored twice with the man advantage, while Columbus was 0-4 on the power play.
It was funny to hear the Harlem Globetrotter comparison again by television play by play man Pat Foley on Saturday. As soon as his flattering description of the Hawks skillful play ended the Jackets got back into the game.
Pinching defenseman with a two goal lead will work at times but the Hawks will have to learn how to adjust. It is fun to watch them play with the throttle wide open but they won’t get away with it against every team.
There are times to gamble, but it isn’t all the time.
The problem as much as anything else is the Hawks get away with playing the same way with a 3-1 lead as in a 1-1 contest, more often than not. They have enough skill to lose leads and comeback to win. But Joel Quenneville will get the message across before the playoffs begin.
I have written this many times, but it bears repeating again. Lessons are more difficult to learn when bad consequences aren’t experienced.
Queeneville will prevent his crew from becoming over confident and he will refine their game tactics. Coach Q. knows there is a fine balance and he realizes they need to understand the same.
Al’s Shots
Well the Hawks came away with six points in their last three divisional games. They now have a great opportunity to have a very successful road trip.
The OT period in Sunday’s game was one of the best I have ever watched.
Tuesday’s contest in Ottawa is a trap game.
The Hawks are coming off three emotional winning efforts and will play a Senators team which is in a playoff battle. Another challenging test…
Those that want to jump on the Hawks defensemen for some slip ups on Sunday, keep this in mind.
Cam Barker missed seven games and he played like he was rusty.
The trio of Barker, Sopel and Jordan Hendry might comprise the best third pairing in the NHL.
Before you say no way….What number five or six defenseman would be an upgrade?
Barker could still be dealt if the right deal came along because the Hawks power play has managed without him. Plus the fact Hendry has filled in nicely in most games.
So maybe at some point before March a more physical presence will be added.
Also when facing Detroit one has to remember Pavel Datsyuk and Henrik Zetterberg are two of the better forwards in the world.
Quick and crafty forwards are able to seal off the back passes when Hawk defenders try to reverse the play in their own zone.
It doesn’t happen very often because most teams can’t successfully forecheck in the same way as Detroit and a couple of others.
Those who have read my blogs over the years know I have been critical of the video replay system.
The technology has improved but the NHL still struggles with consistency.
The controversy in the Detroit-Dallas game from Saturday involved a shootout and the scattered mission of the NHL war room. It’s time for the league to pick a path and decide what the correct definition for conclusive evidence is for overturning an on ice call.
If there is a disagreement among officials on the ice…Shouldn’t the decision then go to the war room alone?
One thing is certain there wasn’t a clear on ice camera shot which would help decide the dispute.
Now if that disputed goal happened in Sunday’s NBC telecast there might have been a different ruling. During the Hawks-Wings game there was a camera placed in each net. Quite possibly the same camera placement would have led to a conclusive view in Dallas, as an overhead shot is often useless.
There are reasons, mostly monetary as to why in the net cameras are not used all the time.
Additional cameras in each net won’t happen in most regular season games because the cost is too high. Maybe in time they will always be used but that won’t happen for this season.
Overhead cameras are now in every arena. The war room in Toronto can get that same camera shot no matter if it is shown to the TV audience or not.
For now the biggest issue is for the NHL to decide on a consistent manner to solve such disputes.
The mistakes may not happen often but they can be very costly.
In my November 15, 2009 blog I covered the cost factors involved in using net cameras for every game. The blog was written in response to a goal dispute in the November 13, 2009, Hawks-Leafs game.
“Too Expensive to be Conclusive”
http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=5410
blackhawkswin@comcast.net
Filed Under: Chicago Blackhawks • Featured • NHL
About the Author:

Al, I really don’t like shootouts (or the extra point for that matter). The standings would look rather different (as to seedings) if all OT losses and ties are considered losses.
After watching that spirited 4-on-4, the league should dump the shootout (and the controversy – did the puck stop, did it go backwards, etc) and play 4-on-4 until a winner is decided… or 4-on-4, then 3-on-3… wins and losses only… no extra points.
Fantastic write up Al. I agree the hawks are off to a great start to the road trip and I am sure most fans would be happy if we won 2 out of the next 6 to break even on this trip. Of course we are happy to get more wins then that and I truly believe we will.
I suspect Mr. Niemi has earned a back to back start and in all likelihood will seem him tomorrow in Ottawa.
I completely agree with you on the Barker situation, on another site I am under the name TKON and I have been battling most of the day with a few others that seem to be ragging on Barker. They absolutely do have some solid points but I just do not agree with some of the things they are saying.
I hope the NHL can fix this replay thing along with the inconsistent officiating that really dampens game play at times. I am very happy with todays game in general, the “trap” does not work so great anymore as skilled teams and great coaching seem to overcome that game. Now if they can get rid of the shootout, fix the officiating and the replay well IMO the NHL would be at its best ever.
Once again really good read.
Al, thanks for this.
You are right to remind fans that while they may want to see someone like Barker traded, there really is not an upgrade available at the present time.
The Senators game on Tuesday is indeed a ‘trap game’.
Ottawa has their Captain Daniel Alfredsson–one of the better all-round forwards in the league, and an inspiration to his mates–back and they are playing with confidence winning three road games against New York, Montreal and as of this writing, Boston.
The Sens are an unpredictable team, difficult to scout because the performance of many of their players is erratic. The same players who might have a poor game deliver a surprising effort in the next. Kovalev is the best example; their goaltenders are another.
Cory Clouston is a very creative coach. He will improvise in mid-game, trying plays that seem oddball–like sending Chris Phillips rushing in from the point–but can often be effective.
He also uses an aggressive two-man forecheck and neutral zone trap against fast teams like the Hawks.
Unheralded players like Chris Kelly and Jarkko Ruutu, solid PK men, can be dangerous around the net. Mike Fisher is a skilled, tough forward who can suddenly find his touch on the scoresheet.
Ottawa is also very successful at home, and they feed off their partisans’ energy.
The Hawks will need to score first and play with discipline–taking a lead, and not allowing the Sens to get back into it. This is critical, because we have seen the Hawks be guilty of exactly that in recent contests.
Ranked 22nd overall, the Senators’ defense is not very physical and they do not defend well in their own zone under pressure. The Sens’ power play is 30th in the league.
But even with those weaknesses, the Hawks should not take them lightly.
Tenacity is a word one can use when describing the Senators. They know no one expects them to beat the best teams, so they are playing with little or nothing to lose.
They will be pumped up to meet the Blackhawks, and I expect some rough stuff from Matt Carkner, Chris Neil and young Zach Smith.
I’ll be there at Scotiabank Place and watching this one with much interest.
These two points are achievable, and essential, as the Western portion of the trip threatens to be extremely tough.
If they stopped the shootout today I wouldn’t care.
Thanks…Interesting comments from the Hot Stove on Saturday mentioning the upcoming CBA for officials this summer
Everyone…the league and officials are walking on egg shells because things are so inconsistent at every level.
Thanks…The Hawks will ahve to be dialed in from the start.
You know thw Sens well and the way to exploit them is on the blueline.
If they aren’t the slowest defensive unit in the NHL they are close to it.
It will be intesesting to see if Q. goes back to Huet….
al i love your writings you know the game very much. as good as the hawks are i think they will not make it or win the cup (i hope i’m wrong) because they need some size on defense to wear down fowards during games and buff has to step it up on wearing down defenders on the other end what he did in the playoffs last year is one reason why the hawks went to conf. finals its very important for him to do the same in the playoffs this year and also i like huet but i think niemi is awesome he should be the #1 goalie if Q does’nt decide soon it could become a problem. what do you think ?
Nice to hear from you Vito,
Before the season, I was all in on the idea the Hawks needing to add size….they have done well without a more physical presence but I think they may add that element to the mix yet.
Unless they go for a home run acquisition like Scott Niedermayer for the blueline….cap space may not allow it anyway…they could very will look to add a big crease clearer. I mentioned that again in this blog.
As far as Huet and Niemi…
Niemi will get enough starts to determine if he should be the #1 this season and maybe for next.
Quenneville is there to win…he isn’t told who to play and could care less about how much each player earns. Q. will choose who will give them the best chance of winning.
By the beginning of March I think we will know how the two rank.
They both have played well overall….if Niemi can keep his great performances up he will be given more and more playing time.