It’s Not Cute To Be A Loser Anymore
Al Cimaglia | Nov 13, 2009 | Comments 5
Maybe their fans will take offense but the Maple Leafs could be the NHL’s version of the Chicago Cubs. The Leafs have been far more successful in winning championships as they have captured 13 Stanley Cups since 1917. The Cubs haven’t won a World Series in over 100 years, so there are differences. But the Leaf fans remind me of the die hard Cub followers who continue to support their club no matter what.
Supporters of the loveable losers on the north side of Chicago have changed somewhat in the last decade or so. Fans still fill Wrigley Field to capacity but now the losing is not as acceptable. Booing and obvious displays of fan displeasure are routine at the “friendly confines”, some players say it is a tough place to play because of the added pressure.
As I watch on TV as the Leafs play at home, their fans are quick to show their unhappiness as well. The bar has been set higher in both places and losing is not as readily accepted and ignored….it isn’t cute any more to be the lovable losers.
The Leafs have hired the person they feel can change their losing culture back to a winning tradition. General Manager Brian Burke will have a chance to be hero, but it remains to be seen how much time he will have to turn the Leafs into a Stanley Cup contender.
Right now it appears he may have over estimated their talent. Burke considered his team a bona fide playoff contender before the season began, for now that opinion appears to be unrealistic. Time will tell if Burke is just a very good hockey administrator or if he can actually judge talent and build a winning franchise.
The Maple Leafs will skate at the United Center without the services of defenseman Mike Komisarek who has a slight tear in a quadriceps muscle. Tonight will be the time for the Leafs original number one goal keeper Vesa Toskala to try to regain the net. He has had a tough season thus far and now finds himself only the starting goal keeper in theory as he has been out played by rookie Jonas Gustavsson.
After a very bad start the Leafs are only treading water in their last ten games (3-3-4). It is not yet time for Toronto fans to abandon all hope for a playoff birth. But they are in need of an immediate turn around or otherwise the Leafs will be playing golf in April once again.
The Hawks had their hands full again with the Colorado Avalanche. The Av’s and the Kings are both interesting young teams which can skate with the Hawks for much of the time. The Av’s like the Kings succumbed to the Hawks in the third period and were dominated in the last frame and in OT. Fortunately the post was Cristobal Huet’s friend and then the Hawks were able to win in a shootout.
Huet played a very solid game for the most part but he still flirts with being the goat. The Colorado first goal was a bad one and if the Hawks would have lost Huet would have caught some sharp criticism once again.
Cam Barker has appeared to be almost invisible on the ice in the last week or so, that is until he scored the game tying goal on Wednesday. It was a great effort by Barker and his top shelf shot was fantastic. Most defensemen don’ have that type of ability. Barker needs to build off his sparkling effort and be more assertive.
When the really good Hawks show up they are difficult to beat. Unfortunately 60 minute top efforts haven’t happened in every game. The Hawks are battling and dealing with key injuries so the results have been impressive.
Tonight they need to be as desperate as the Leafs from the beginning of the game. With a win the Hawks will have to take their momentum into Sunday night. The Sharks could be the best team in hockey… but first things first.
The season is still young but the Leafs are in survival mode. The Hawks must match Toronto’s intensity from the opening puck drop.
Al’s Shots
I have been writing Blackhawk blogs for a few years and although it is nice when readers agree with my opinions it isn’t most important. As long as I can express my views in a fashion which readers understand…mission accomplished. If readers see a different angle or are stimulated to think about a topic in another way then great, but I don’t really try to change anyone’s mind.
That said, anyone who feels the Hawks should sacrifice Patrick Kane and try to trade him or not re-sign him is watching a different sport than I am.
Kane is just starting to get really good. Only a lack of desire on his part or injuries can hold him back from being an elite talent. In the next couple of years Kane will get stronger and add another gear which will make him an even more potent scoring force.
In the past Phil Kessel has played well against his old college adversary Jonathan Toews.
I want to see an up close view of the Leafs center Matt Stajan and defenseman Garnet Exelby.
Kris Versteeg is a very creative player with a lot of ability. He is still young but he doesn’t appear to be an NHL center. Too many plays stop with Versteeg and he often makes ill advised passes. It would be best for the Hawks to put him at wing with some skillful mates.
Many fans want Marian Hossa to skate along side Kane. If I were coach Q. my choice would be to have Versteeg play with Hossa and Byfuglien.
In my view Kane and Sharp should always be together and pairing them with Toews would work well…it has in the past.
It appears Hossa should be back to face the Canucks on the November 22nd or the Sharks on the 25th.
Center Andrew Ebbett needs to step up and seize a great opportunity.
Ebbett could center for Hossa and Versteeg while John Madden, Troy Brouwer and Andrew Ladd could be a potent checking line which can also score.
blackhawkswin@comcast.net
Filed Under: Chicago Blackhawks • Featured • NHL
About the Author:
I agree with you when it comes to Kane. There is just no way in my mind that the Hawks could justify doing anything but re-signing him. Even if they wanted to deal him considering their cap issues I don’t see anyway to get a decent return unless you’d be willing to take prospects or picks. For a talent like him that wouldn’t make sense.
Q said about Ebbett before the Leafs game: “I just think being consistent and filling that spot. It’s a great opportunity there to play with those guys. We’ll see how he handles it, but there’s a lot of options to go in there if things are just OK.”
Well, Ebbett have played 9 minutes, fewest minutes from the team. I remember he was not playing in the third period already. I think Q. consider him simply useless – and Q have right.
What can Q do? Say it to Bowman Ebbett is terrible please put him back to the waiver.
If Bowman does not trade really for a center then we will see the last year story: Sharp is moving to center position until Bolland coming back. I would make this change.
Buff, Toews, Hossa
Kane, Sharp, Versteeg
Brouwer, Madden, Ladd
Eager, Fraser, Kopecky
My friend don’t worry…Ebbett is not the second coming of Dave Bolland and they know it.
Hossa will be back soon and then after a few weeks if need be, they will go after a center.
I didn’t think they played much hockey in Hungary…you know the game, that’s great and thanks for reading.
I am a Blackhaws fan since 1990. That time I was watching NHL games on Eurosport and Screensport but I didn’t have so many info about the teams. I loved the Blackhawks because of Larmer, Goulet, Graham…
I was able to listen to the Blackhawks matches on a radio later – thanks to the internet NHL radio. I woke up 2.30 AM european time… Nowadays I am watching every games – thanks to the espn360.
The Blackhawks never ever played in Hungary but this year I was going to Helsinki and finally I have watched them.
I have red your blog on hockeybuzz and espn too.
Sorry for my so much words :)
What is your opinion about Stajan? I think he have been good yesterday. He is a truly passing center, with good hands, fit to the Blackhawks but not instead of Bolland. Only if Bolland situation will be worse.
Al, I’ve been of the opinion for a while now that Toews needs one of Brouwer, Byfuglien or Ladd riding shotgun with him, since it seems his point production drys up when he is matched with two smaller forwards. Which I suppose is a testament to him that he is able to adjust and do some of the dirty work along the boards when it’s called for.
We’ll see what happens once Hossa gets in the lineup, but it wouldn’t surprise me at all if Quenneville stuck with one line he thinks is really solid, then adjusts the others as he sees fit. You’ll recall he did that last year, keeping Bolland/Havlat/Ladd together almost the whole year, while there was more juggling amongst the other lines.