<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tick Tock Antti Is On The Clock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/</link>
	<description>NHL hockey blogosphere of your favorite team rumors, trades, opinion, recaps, previews and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11774</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11774</guid>
		<description>All the talk of him looking for 3 mill etc...

The Hawks had a plan and they to chose to replace him for a lot less...that wasn a huge raise...

I say only... but here it is different now...get Bickell for 1.7 mill less...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the talk of him looking for 3 mill etc&#8230;</p>
<p>The Hawks had a plan and they to chose to replace him for a lot less&#8230;that wasn a huge raise&#8230;</p>
<p>I say only&#8230; but here it is different now&#8230;get Bickell for 1.7 mill less&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Morris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11765</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11765</guid>
		<description>Folks, to add to the perspective on this situation, Andrew Ladd just signed a one year deal for $2.35. 

So when Stan said &quot;guys want raises&quot;, he wasn&#039;t kidding.

If Antti is focused solely on the money, he may not be wearing the Indian Head next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, to add to the perspective on this situation, Andrew Ladd just signed a one year deal for $2.35. </p>
<p>So when Stan said &#8220;guys want raises&#8221;, he wasn&#8217;t kidding.</p>
<p>If Antti is focused solely on the money, he may not be wearing the Indian Head next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11764</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11764</guid>
		<description>My guess....... decision will be by close of business tomorrow if not sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess&#8230;&#8230;. decision will be by close of business tomorrow if not sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pricey</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11763</link>
		<dc:creator>pricey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11763</guid>
		<description>Damn.  I&#039;d love for it to be decided by tomorrow afternoon, at least.  

It&#039;s a long weekend here in Canada and I don&#039;t want to think about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn.  I&#8217;d love for it to be decided by tomorrow afternoon, at least.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a long weekend here in Canada and I don&#8217;t want to think about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shruew</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11762</link>
		<dc:creator>shruew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11762</guid>
		<description>The arbitrator has up to 48 hours to return a ruling though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arbitrator has up to 48 hours to return a ruling though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pricey</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11760</link>
		<dc:creator>pricey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11760</guid>
		<description>A-Day is here.

At least they are doing it first thing in the morning, so there is no waiting around today.

If Niemi is gone, I think I&#039;d lean towards Turco, I used to lean towawrds Theodore but that point djd brings up is a great one.  Turco is a master at playing the puck, something that Niemi was terrible at.. Imagine the Hawks transition game with Turco back there.. It might get even better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A-Day is here.</p>
<p>At least they are doing it first thing in the morning, so there is no waiting around today.</p>
<p>If Niemi is gone, I think I&#8217;d lean towards Turco, I used to lean towawrds Theodore but that point djd brings up is a great one.  Turco is a master at playing the puck, something that Niemi was terrible at.. Imagine the Hawks transition game with Turco back there.. It might get even better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living the Cup</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11752</link>
		<dc:creator>Living the Cup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11752</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, it&#039;s likely a moot point and if the Hawks walk away they&#039;ll sign somebody for considerably less and move on. 

This also means they likely wouldn&#039;t match even a low offer to Niemi.  If that happens that  would be a PR mess for SB - if fans see Niemi making a low-ish salary somewhere else and it&#039;s thought that the Blackhawks could have/should have paid the equivalent to retain him.

I guess I&#039;m suggesting this a reason SB might give in a little rather than go arbitration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, it&#8217;s likely a moot point and if the Hawks walk away they&#8217;ll sign somebody for considerably less and move on. </p>
<p>This also means they likely wouldn&#8217;t match even a low offer to Niemi.  If that happens that  would be a PR mess for SB &#8211; if fans see Niemi making a low-ish salary somewhere else and it&#8217;s thought that the Blackhawks could have/should have paid the equivalent to retain him.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m suggesting this a reason SB might give in a little rather than go arbitration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11751</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11751</guid>
		<description>My comment was incomplete..but my point was if the Hawks walk away and Niemi is re-signed..as in your example for 2.3 after being awarded 3 mill(less than 80%) the Hawks could match the offer by the Sharks or whomever within 7 days.

So SJ wouldn&#039;t necessarily be able to get Niemi for less than 20% off the award amount without the Hawks having an option.

If that scenario was a possibility the Hawks would make sure they had the flexibility...is my guess.

Niemi would be a UFA only to point.


The rule states..

   (c) If a Club exercises its walk-away right, the following
applies:

                  (i)     If the player accepts an offer from a
New Club in respect of that year of the contract which the Prior
Club has walked-away from that is less than 80% of the award for
such year, the Prior Club may, within seven (7) days after the
date it receives the applicable Offer Sheet, elect to match the
offer of the New Club and the Player and the Prior Club shall
enter into a Player Contract on those terms and conditions;

Most likely a moot point because...

My thinking is if they are going to walk away the Hawks will sign another goalie for considerably less....that will be their choice as Niemi will move on and so will the Hawks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment was incomplete..but my point was if the Hawks walk away and Niemi is re-signed..as in your example for 2.3 after being awarded 3 mill(less than 80%) the Hawks could match the offer by the Sharks or whomever within 7 days.</p>
<p>So SJ wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be able to get Niemi for less than 20% off the award amount without the Hawks having an option.</p>
<p>If that scenario was a possibility the Hawks would make sure they had the flexibility&#8230;is my guess.</p>
<p>Niemi would be a UFA only to point.</p>
<p>The rule states..</p>
<p>   (c) If a Club exercises its walk-away right, the following<br />
applies:</p>
<p>                  (i)     If the player accepts an offer from a<br />
New Club in respect of that year of the contract which the Prior<br />
Club has walked-away from that is less than 80% of the award for<br />
such year, the Prior Club may, within seven (7) days after the<br />
date it receives the applicable Offer Sheet, elect to match the<br />
offer of the New Club and the Player and the Prior Club shall<br />
enter into a Player Contract on those terms and conditions;</p>
<p>Most likely a moot point because&#8230;</p>
<p>My thinking is if they are going to walk away the Hawks will sign another goalie for considerably less&#8230;.that will be their choice as Niemi will move on and so will the Hawks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living the Cup</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11748</link>
		<dc:creator>Living the Cup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11748</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand Al, why SJ couldn&#039;t sign him for less then 80% - he&#039;s a UFA at that point isn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand Al, why SJ couldn&#8217;t sign him for less then 80% &#8211; he&#8217;s a UFA at that point isn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11746</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11746</guid>
		<description>Thanks...


If he signs ahead of time I am thinking $2.1-$2.3.

Zito will roll the dice for less because he figures they will at least be awarded Quick&#039;s money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230;</p>
<p>If he signs ahead of time I am thinking $2.1-$2.3.</p>
<p>Zito will roll the dice for less because he figures they will at least be awarded Quick&#8217;s money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11745</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11745</guid>
		<description>SJ can&#039;t sign Niemi for less than 80% of award amount regardless of how many goalies the Hawks have already signed.

If it deosn&#039;t go to arbitration it won&#039;t take $2.5 to settle it.

If Niemi&#039;s award amount is less than $3 mill and the Hawks can somehow sign and trade they would do so...Niemi would end up in Philly, on the Island or maybe Edmonton..but they won&#039;t trade to a conference foe if they could help it. 

Don&#039;t forget SJ is still lookig for a top pairing defender and they don&#039;t have a lot of cap space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJ can&#8217;t sign Niemi for less than 80% of award amount regardless of how many goalies the Hawks have already signed.</p>
<p>If it deosn&#8217;t go to arbitration it won&#8217;t take $2.5 to settle it.</p>
<p>If Niemi&#8217;s award amount is less than $3 mill and the Hawks can somehow sign and trade they would do so&#8230;Niemi would end up in Philly, on the Island or maybe Edmonton..but they won&#8217;t trade to a conference foe if they could help it. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget SJ is still lookig for a top pairing defender and they don&#8217;t have a lot of cap space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living the Cup</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11744</link>
		<dc:creator>Living the Cup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11744</guid>
		<description>here&#039;s a nightmare scenario for the Hawks

Niemi wins $3m or so in arbitration and the Hawks walk away then sign Turco/Theodore

Wilson signs Niemi for 2.5 which the Hawks can&#039;t match because it&#039;s greater than 80% of 3M. Bowman absolutely cannot let that happen.  OR worse still Neimi  signs with SJ for 2.3 and Chi can&#039;t match because they already signed Turco/Theodore.

SO.. I&#039;ll stick with my prediction of a last second resolution avoiding arbitration at 2.3 - 2.5.

At 2.5 it&#039;ll be a tough year financially but they&#039;ll suck it up and get some breathing room the next year.  Then we can sign Niemi long term which is what the Hawks  should have in mind as the ultimate goal here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s a nightmare scenario for the Hawks</p>
<p>Niemi wins $3m or so in arbitration and the Hawks walk away then sign Turco/Theodore</p>
<p>Wilson signs Niemi for 2.5 which the Hawks can&#8217;t match because it&#8217;s greater than 80% of 3M. Bowman absolutely cannot let that happen.  OR worse still Neimi  signs with SJ for 2.3 and Chi can&#8217;t match because they already signed Turco/Theodore.</p>
<p>SO.. I&#8217;ll stick with my prediction of a last second resolution avoiding arbitration at 2.3 &#8211; 2.5.</p>
<p>At 2.5 it&#8217;ll be a tough year financially but they&#8217;ll suck it up and get some breathing room the next year.  Then we can sign Niemi long term which is what the Hawks  should have in mind as the ultimate goal here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djd</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11738</link>
		<dc:creator>djd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11738</guid>
		<description>I agree Dave, Turco and Theo are sound alternatives. My preference would be for Turco … I&#039;m just wondering how many miles his puck moving ability would save for Duncan Keith and Campbell. Significant mileage indeed would be my guess.

Anyway, good blog Al, your consistency is why many of us look here first.

Antti avoids arbitration and signs a 1 yr at 1.8. I&#039;m stickin&#039; to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Dave, Turco and Theo are sound alternatives. My preference would be for Turco … I&#8217;m just wondering how many miles his puck moving ability would save for Duncan Keith and Campbell. Significant mileage indeed would be my guess.</p>
<p>Anyway, good blog Al, your consistency is why many of us look here first.</p>
<p>Antti avoids arbitration and signs a 1 yr at 1.8. I&#8217;m stickin&#8217; to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Morris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/20336/comment-page-1/#comment-11736</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=20336#comment-11736</guid>
		<description>Al, thanks for the update.

Actually, as I mentioned to you, the Theodore item comes from La Presse in Montreal...in terms of its quality, probably the leading newspaper for hockey coverage in Canada right now. So there have probably been substantial discussions.

It appears Stan has a few options. Turco or Theodore in net are sound alternatives, and Theo was strong behind a porous Caps team last year.

Two vets who have lots to be hungry for.

It&#039;s a tough situation for all parties involved, but there&#039;s only so much money.

Bowman has done his best to get the books in order, after the free-spending of the Tallon days. 

Sometimes changes like this can be good. It can give the team a new focus and motivation. We saw what the Coyotes and Avs did last year after the so-called experts predicted they would finish in the West basement.

Hawks fans have a Stanley Cup Championship team. Instead of worrying about what was lost in terms of personnel, and might go wrong, they might want to enjoy that fact, and look ahead to what the new faces can do.

That&#039;s my perspective, anyway...and I am looking forward to what happens next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, thanks for the update.</p>
<p>Actually, as I mentioned to you, the Theodore item comes from La Presse in Montreal&#8230;in terms of its quality, probably the leading newspaper for hockey coverage in Canada right now. So there have probably been substantial discussions.</p>
<p>It appears Stan has a few options. Turco or Theodore in net are sound alternatives, and Theo was strong behind a porous Caps team last year.</p>
<p>Two vets who have lots to be hungry for.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tough situation for all parties involved, but there&#8217;s only so much money.</p>
<p>Bowman has done his best to get the books in order, after the free-spending of the Tallon days. </p>
<p>Sometimes changes like this can be good. It can give the team a new focus and motivation. We saw what the Coyotes and Avs did last year after the so-called experts predicted they would finish in the West basement.</p>
<p>Hawks fans have a Stanley Cup Championship team. Instead of worrying about what was lost in terms of personnel, and might go wrong, they might want to enjoy that fact, and look ahead to what the new faces can do.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my perspective, anyway&#8230;and I am looking forward to what happens next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

