<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arbitrate This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/</link>
	<description>NHL hockey blogosphere of your favorite team rumors, trades, opinion, recaps, previews and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: General_Sosabowski</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11321</link>
		<dc:creator>General_Sosabowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11321</guid>
		<description>With a handle like General Sosabowski, obviously another Pole!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a handle like General Sosabowski, obviously another Pole!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkFanDave</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkFanDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 03:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>hey shruew(ski)...

proud purebred Pole here too

and... I don&#039;t like the Spezza thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey shruew(ski)&#8230;</p>
<p>proud purebred Pole here too</p>
<p>and&#8230; I don&#8217;t like the Spezza thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djd</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11311</link>
		<dc:creator>djd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11311</guid>
		<description>LOL, Dave, perfect description/comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, Dave, perfect description/comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11306</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11306</guid>
		<description>No you never denied it... actually in all the years never knew you were....my wife&#039;s half Polish although she looks more Italian than me....lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you never denied it&#8230; actually in all the years never knew you were&#8230;.my wife&#8217;s half Polish although she looks more Italian than me&#8230;.lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Morris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11304</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11304</guid>
		<description>Being in Ottawa, I&#039;ve seen Spezza play more than once. Imagine a tall Versteeg without the feistiness. And a $7 mil cap hit.

Pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being in Ottawa, I&#8217;ve seen Spezza play more than once. Imagine a tall Versteeg without the feistiness. And a $7 mil cap hit.</p>
<p>Pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shruew</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11299</link>
		<dc:creator>shruew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11299</guid>
		<description>Was on another browser so I had to retype it and threw in the -ski.  Dont recall ever denying being a proud Pole :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was on another browser so I had to retype it and threw in the -ski.  Dont recall ever denying being a proud Pole :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11297</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11297</guid>
		<description>Big if...

Did you change your handle?

Finally fessing up to being of Polish descent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big if&#8230;</p>
<p>Did you change your handle?</p>
<p>Finally fessing up to being of Polish descent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shruewski</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11295</link>
		<dc:creator>shruewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11295</guid>
		<description>If Spezza had only 1 or 2 years left it could be debatable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Spezza had only 1 or 2 years left it could be debatable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>No....2) Sens get rid of chronic underachiever

Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;.2) Sens get rid of chronic underachiever</p>
<p>Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeynut</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>hockeynut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this has been floated elsewhere.

Spezza for Campbell.

1) Hawks get $142,785 in relief
2) Sens get rid of chronic underachiever
3) Spezza comes off the books 1 year earlier than Campbell and is 4 years younger.  Spezza is 27, Campbell is 31
4) Spezza slots in as the #2 Center and gets out of the glare of the Canadian spotlight.  Chicago isn&#039;t Columbus obviously but Spezza&#039;s underachievement won&#039;t be a national sports news story either.
5) If the Hawks figure out a way to get more production out of the big playmaking center he has way more value than Campbell ever will.  Spezza still has upside, Campbell is a finished product.
6) Bolland becomes the #3 Center. On a high caliber team that is where he belongs.
7) Sharpy gets to stay on the wing if Quenneville wants him to. 
8) Chicago can start the season with one AHL center instead of two.  In this scenario I like Dowell over Reasoner. 
9) Murray gets to finally move Spezza.

If I am Murray I ask for 2 prospects as sweetener because of Spezza&#039;s age. If I am Bowman I give it to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this has been floated elsewhere.</p>
<p>Spezza for Campbell.</p>
<p>1) Hawks get $142,785 in relief<br />
2) Sens get rid of chronic underachiever<br />
3) Spezza comes off the books 1 year earlier than Campbell and is 4 years younger.  Spezza is 27, Campbell is 31<br />
4) Spezza slots in as the #2 Center and gets out of the glare of the Canadian spotlight.  Chicago isn&#8217;t Columbus obviously but Spezza&#8217;s underachievement won&#8217;t be a national sports news story either.<br />
5) If the Hawks figure out a way to get more production out of the big playmaking center he has way more value than Campbell ever will.  Spezza still has upside, Campbell is a finished product.<br />
6) Bolland becomes the #3 Center. On a high caliber team that is where he belongs.<br />
7) Sharpy gets to stay on the wing if Quenneville wants him to.<br />
8) Chicago can start the season with one AHL center instead of two.  In this scenario I like Dowell over Reasoner.<br />
9) Murray gets to finally move Spezza.</p>
<p>If I am Murray I ask for 2 prospects as sweetener because of Spezza&#8217;s age. If I am Bowman I give it to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living the Cup</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11272</link>
		<dc:creator>Living the Cup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11272</guid>
		<description>Just playing around on capgeek...Assuming Bickell and Hendry sign for 6K (which another blog speculated) the Hawks get under the cap with Niemi at 2.3 and trading/waiving Reasoner BUT being able to keep Kopecky.

You gotta figure Stan knows this too - given the tight spot the Hawks are in the above would be a major win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just playing around on capgeek&#8230;Assuming Bickell and Hendry sign for 6K (which another blog speculated) the Hawks get under the cap with Niemi at 2.3 and trading/waiving Reasoner BUT being able to keep Kopecky.</p>
<p>You gotta figure Stan knows this too &#8211; given the tight spot the Hawks are in the above would be a major win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkFanDave</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11255</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkFanDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11255</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reminder.  I didn&#039;t remember that you speculated on which teams he may be willing to go to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder.  I didn&#8217;t remember that you speculated on which teams he may be willing to go to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11254</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11254</guid>
		<description>I wrote about Campbell on Friday..

It&#039;s Crawford&#039;s turm this yr...having only on yr. left means nothing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about Campbell on Friday..</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Crawford&#8217;s turm this yr&#8230;having only on yr. left means nothing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkFanDave</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11252</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkFanDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11252</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Zito sees it as leverage that Crawford is going into the last year of his contract as well.  Or am I really stretching now?

Joe Fallon is an UFA with St. Louis.  I liked his play in Rockford.  Wonder if Stan would re-sign him for depth??  

Heck, could Crawford be the odd man out again this year?  Toivonen (or Fallon) would save $250,000 and any dollar saved is a good dollar.

If Antii gets $2M, another trade is likely.  If he gets more, it&#039;s a necessity.

Campbell has a No Trade Clause.  Do you think he would accept a trade to Florida?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Zito sees it as leverage that Crawford is going into the last year of his contract as well.  Or am I really stretching now?</p>
<p>Joe Fallon is an UFA with St. Louis.  I liked his play in Rockford.  Wonder if Stan would re-sign him for depth??  </p>
<p>Heck, could Crawford be the odd man out again this year?  Toivonen (or Fallon) would save $250,000 and any dollar saved is a good dollar.</p>
<p>If Antii gets $2M, another trade is likely.  If he gets more, it&#8217;s a necessity.</p>
<p>Campbell has a No Trade Clause.  Do you think he would accept a trade to Florida?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11250</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11250</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s appears that either Zito will have to sign what Bowman offers or they go to arbitration.

The biggest loser in both cases could be Niemi if the award was too high...the Hawks trade him to a team with cap space or he becomes a UFA and can&#039;t sign with any club for more than Bowman was offering.

It is in everyones best interest to get it done but Bowman has the check book and the account is almost overdrawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s appears that either Zito will have to sign what Bowman offers or they go to arbitration.</p>
<p>The biggest loser in both cases could be Niemi if the award was too high&#8230;the Hawks trade him to a team with cap space or he becomes a UFA and can&#8217;t sign with any club for more than Bowman was offering.</p>
<p>It is in everyones best interest to get it done but Bowman has the check book and the account is almost overdrawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkFanDave</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11249</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkFanDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11249</guid>
		<description>Al, do you think Bowman won&#039;t budge on a two-year contract and that&#039;s why he and Zito have yet to strike a deal?  

I&#039;m surprised they haven&#039;t gotten it done yet, but maybe both sides are playing chicken until we get closer to D-day (or would that be A-day?)...

What if they make it a bonus-laden deal?  Would the bonus be deferred to next year?  Does deferral depend on the type of bonus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, do you think Bowman won&#8217;t budge on a two-year contract and that&#8217;s why he and Zito have yet to strike a deal?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised they haven&#8217;t gotten it done yet, but maybe both sides are playing chicken until we get closer to D-day (or would that be A-day?)&#8230;</p>
<p>What if they make it a bonus-laden deal?  Would the bonus be deferred to next year?  Does deferral depend on the type of bonus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11244</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11244</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice words.

I thought $2.3 to begin with....If Zito would come in at $2.2-3 I think Bowman would sign off now.

The tune is changing out of Zito...there&#039;s no more 3-4 mill talk...now he says he would like to avoid arbitration...I don&#039;t blame him.

If I am Bowman I am offering him about what you said with just a little wiggle room.

I also would tell him if it goes to arbitration the Hawks will seek a two yr. ruling....

Zito knows he could come out with a $2.2 ruling and be stuck for two years instead of just agreeing to a one yr deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice words.</p>
<p>I thought $2.3 to begin with&#8230;.If Zito would come in at $2.2-3 I think Bowman would sign off now.</p>
<p>The tune is changing out of Zito&#8230;there&#8217;s no more 3-4 mill talk&#8230;now he says he would like to avoid arbitration&#8230;I don&#8217;t blame him.</p>
<p>If I am Bowman I am offering him about what you said with just a little wiggle room.</p>
<p>I also would tell him if it goes to arbitration the Hawks will seek a two yr. ruling&#8230;.</p>
<p>Zito knows he could come out with a $2.2 ruling and be stuck for two years instead of just agreeing to a one yr deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeynut</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11242</link>
		<dc:creator>hockeynut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11242</guid>
		<description>Love this blog and the opinions on it.

 Bowman sent Zito and Niemi the clear message by publicly guaranteeing Sharp he isn&#039;t going anywhere  that they will not shed anymore salary to accomodate them at the negotiating table. 

If I am Bowman I have 1.9 on the table with room to 2.2  and am banking on Zito realizing this is a terrible market for Goaltenders.

It the arbiter goes 2.5+ Bowman will let Niemi walk without even thinking about it.  He has to.

Campbell isn&#039;t going anywhere while the Hawks have their current salary cap issues.  Who would do them that favor? I think McCabe for Campbell for 1.4 in relief while it is much needed is not enough.

The roster as I pencil it out without Huet because he will not be there comes in at $57.1 +/- a rounding error.  That leaves 2.2 for Niemi and puts them right against it.

Just my thought. Good luck Stan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this blog and the opinions on it.</p>
<p> Bowman sent Zito and Niemi the clear message by publicly guaranteeing Sharp he isn&#8217;t going anywhere  that they will not shed anymore salary to accomodate them at the negotiating table. </p>
<p>If I am Bowman I have 1.9 on the table with room to 2.2  and am banking on Zito realizing this is a terrible market for Goaltenders.</p>
<p>It the arbiter goes 2.5+ Bowman will let Niemi walk without even thinking about it.  He has to.</p>
<p>Campbell isn&#8217;t going anywhere while the Hawks have their current salary cap issues.  Who would do them that favor? I think McCabe for Campbell for 1.4 in relief while it is much needed is not enough.</p>
<p>The roster as I pencil it out without Huet because he will not be there comes in at $57.1 +/- a rounding error.  That leaves 2.2 for Niemi and puts them right against it.</p>
<p>Just my thought. Good luck Stan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkFanDave</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11238</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkFanDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11238</guid>
		<description>Al, you&#039;re right.  Every dollar is critical.  It&#039;s the difference between possibly keeping Reasoner, Brouwer, or Kopecky for a little veteran presence... or resigning Bickell or Hendry to round out the roster... and having to settle for Klinkhammer or Makarov or Cullimore or rushing another prospect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, you&#8217;re right.  Every dollar is critical.  It&#8217;s the difference between possibly keeping Reasoner, Brouwer, or Kopecky for a little veteran presence&#8230; or resigning Bickell or Hendry to round out the roster&#8230; and having to settle for Klinkhammer or Makarov or Cullimore or rushing another prospect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Morris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11237</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11237</guid>
		<description>...or how about 10 years, 22.5 million?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or how about 10 years, 22.5 million?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Morris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11236</guid>
		<description>Shreuw&gt; y&#039;know, maybe he does....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shreuw&gt; y&#8217;know, maybe he does&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11234</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11234</guid>
		<description>That is why there is no way Huey can stay on the roster.

Plus.. $1.4 mill doesn&#039;t sound like a lot but here it is.

The extra 1-1.5 mill on Hammer&#039;s deal did hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is why there is no way Huey can stay on the roster.</p>
<p>Plus.. $1.4 mill doesn&#8217;t sound like a lot but here it is.</p>
<p>The extra 1-1.5 mill on Hammer&#8217;s deal did hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shruew</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11231</link>
		<dc:creator>shruew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11231</guid>
		<description>Maybe Niemi signs for 20 years front loaded for $45MM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Niemi signs for 20 years front loaded for $45MM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HawkFanDave</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11230</link>
		<dc:creator>HawkFanDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11230</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve studied the CBA extensively, but from my elementary understanding of it, the Hawks still have approximately $4.8M ($4,863,410 if CapGeek.com&#039;s numbers are exact) to spend before they reach their limit of 10% over the cap.  

That 10% cap overage is only permissible during the offseason.  They still have to get total salaries, including last year&#039;s &quot;deferred bonus&quot; penalties, under $59.4M once the season starts.  

Let&#039;s say Niemi signs for $2M; a little unrealistically optimistic, but let&#039;s say he does.  That gives Bowman $2.8M to play with until the Hawks reach the magic 10% overage.  So he has breathing room during the summer months.

That also leaves management with a major decision.  Either Huet starts the season in Rockford and the club buries his salary of $5,625,000 in the minors, or they have to make a major trade to reduce salaries by $5M to $6M.  

Yikes.

Which leads to the logical conclusion that Huet has to remain in the minors.  He&#039;d be crazy to walk away from his contract, and nobody is going to trade for him.

If Bowman and Tallon make a trade (Campbell for McCabe), the Hawks only save $1.4M off the cap for 2010-2011.  That means we cannot take McCabe back without sending Huet down or still needing to make another blockbuster, salary dump trade.

That one would really smell like a salary dump.

Okay, let&#039;s assume Bowman has already informed Huet that he starts the season in Rockford.  Take Huet&#039;s $5.625M off the books and bring up Corey Crawford.  Roster still stands at 18 players and total salaries are approximately $57.7M.  

That leaves a minimum of two roster spots to fill, maximum of five.  And only $1.8M (approximately) to fill those spots.

Again, yikes.

In my humble opinion, Bowman cannot afford to sign Niemi for much more than $2M.  And shedding Campbell&#039;s salary for McCabe would provide much needed breathing room for this year, but more importantly going forward.

If you want to see this for yourselves, go to http://www.capgeek.com/cap_calculator/index.php?teamId=11 and play with the numbers yourselves.  

It ain&#039;t purty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve studied the CBA extensively, but from my elementary understanding of it, the Hawks still have approximately $4.8M ($4,863,410 if CapGeek.com&#8217;s numbers are exact) to spend before they reach their limit of 10% over the cap.  </p>
<p>That 10% cap overage is only permissible during the offseason.  They still have to get total salaries, including last year&#8217;s &#8220;deferred bonus&#8221; penalties, under $59.4M once the season starts.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say Niemi signs for $2M; a little unrealistically optimistic, but let&#8217;s say he does.  That gives Bowman $2.8M to play with until the Hawks reach the magic 10% overage.  So he has breathing room during the summer months.</p>
<p>That also leaves management with a major decision.  Either Huet starts the season in Rockford and the club buries his salary of $5,625,000 in the minors, or they have to make a major trade to reduce salaries by $5M to $6M.  </p>
<p>Yikes.</p>
<p>Which leads to the logical conclusion that Huet has to remain in the minors.  He&#8217;d be crazy to walk away from his contract, and nobody is going to trade for him.</p>
<p>If Bowman and Tallon make a trade (Campbell for McCabe), the Hawks only save $1.4M off the cap for 2010-2011.  That means we cannot take McCabe back without sending Huet down or still needing to make another blockbuster, salary dump trade.</p>
<p>That one would really smell like a salary dump.</p>
<p>Okay, let&#8217;s assume Bowman has already informed Huet that he starts the season in Rockford.  Take Huet&#8217;s $5.625M off the books and bring up Corey Crawford.  Roster still stands at 18 players and total salaries are approximately $57.7M.  </p>
<p>That leaves a minimum of two roster spots to fill, maximum of five.  And only $1.8M (approximately) to fill those spots.</p>
<p>Again, yikes.</p>
<p>In my humble opinion, Bowman cannot afford to sign Niemi for much more than $2M.  And shedding Campbell&#8217;s salary for McCabe would provide much needed breathing room for this year, but more importantly going forward.</p>
<p>If you want to see this for yourselves, go to <a href="http://www.capgeek.com/cap_calculator/index.php?teamId=11" rel="nofollow">http://www.capgeek.com/cap_calculator/index.php?teamId=11</a> and play with the numbers yourselves.  </p>
<p>It ain&#8217;t purty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/19873/comment-page-1/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=19873#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>the reason Crawford didn&#039;t make the roster was because of the difference between Nimei and his contract...waiver provisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the reason Crawford didn&#8217;t make the roster was because of the difference between Nimei and his contract&#8230;waiver provisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

