Hawks Take a Commanding Lead While Flyers Search for Answers

After losing Game 2, if the Flyers can muster the will and know how to capture the Stanley Cup they will be a team for the ages. Given the fact 91% of teams which win the opening two games of the Finals go on to become champions, the Flyers are in a deep, deep hole. After overcoming a three game to none deficit to the Bruins, if the Flyers were to defeat the Blackhawks they would be revered for years to come.

Realistically the Flyers don’t appear deep enough and so far haven’t had the necessary goal tending to make a comeback likely. In Game 2 the best player on the ice was Antti Niemi and was the biggest reason why the Hawks have a commanding lead in the series.

From the opening eight minutes of the second period on Niemi reeled off six huge saves. His best stop came late in the middle frame on Arron Asham, but Niemi wasn’t done. Philadelphia was all over Chicago in the final period and could have scored a bunch of goals. The Flyers made up for the slow opening period but Niemi was the Blackhawks savior in the late going.

The Hawks played more tentative with a lead than normal. Trying to capture the Stanley Cup will cause some apprehensiveness.   

Even though the Flyers were in desperation mode Niemi stayed strong. He made some great stops during the last frame and left very few rebounds.

Simon Gagne was the Flyers best player and in the final twenty minutes alone could have scored a hat trick. Niemi wouldn’t flinch as he made sure the Flyers skated out of Chicago still wondering what they needed to do beat the Hawks.

Post game comments from Danny Briere indicated the Flyers were overly concerned with stopping the Hawks attack in periods one and two. The skillful winger thought they were too influenced by the high score of Game 1.  Flyers head coach Peter Laviolette wouldn’t necessarily agree with Briere, but he thought his crew could have started the game better.

Laviolette’s assessment was the Hawks were in control at the beginning of the game and they influenced the Flyers slow start. He thought the second period was fairly even although the Hawks scored twice. The Flyers bench boss said his team had the better of the third period. In conclusion Laviolette thought Niemi was the difference.

Laviolette had all good points, as the Flyers did have more chances to score but couldn’t seal the deal. Philly would need their goal tending to be at least as good as Niemi to have a chance in the series. So far Niemi has been better in each game.

The Flyers do their best work in the Hawks zone, but they can’t sustain the same pressure all over the ice. Philly doesn’t have four effective lines or six reliable defensemen.

Chicago’s depth on offense and defense was the difference in Game 2. 

Ben Eager played a whole 4:03 and besides having the game winning goal averaged a hit for every minute he played. The fourth liner made his presence felt.

As has been the case throughout the post season Joel Quenneville made the correct calls. Eager was sent out on the ice after Marian Hossa scored to skate with Jonathan Toews and Dustin Byfuglien. Quenneville commented he was looking  for some energy and to create more space so he substituted Eager for Patrick Kane.

Twenty eight seconds after Hossa scored Eager launched a wicked wrist shot and potted the game winning goal. Eager toe dragged the puck and used Flyer defender Matt Carle as a screen and beat Michael Leighton to the near post. The Hawks had added another goal while one of their top scorers was on the bench. The Flyers have been able to stop Kane but they can’t contain everyone.

On the Hossa score the Hawks played keep away and eventually the puck found its way behind Michael Leighton. Chris Pronger or Kimmo Timonen can’t always be on the ice. Chicago’s first tally occurred while Lukas Krajicek and Oskars Bartulis were playing. They are the Flyers number five and six defensemen and Leighton couldn’t be faulted.

The biggest difference between the two clubs is the Hawks are playing with a bigger stack of chips. 

Make no mistake the Flyers haven’t been badly outplayed, actually on Monday evening they had more shots and chances to score than the Blackhawks. In my opinion Philadelphia is the best team Chicago has faced all year and they have the toughest foreckeck as well.

Once again Quenneville looked more relieved than happy after his team won. He knows his crew has not played a complete game yet.  

The good news is his squad has a commanding lead in the series and is now headed out of town. Going to Philly may chill out the young Blackhawks and help them refocus on playing more effective hockey.

When the Canucks tried to rough up the Hawks so they could slow them down, it didn’t work. When the Sharks tried to change to be more aggressive and looked to shoot high on Niemi it didn’t work. The Flyers are still trying to adjust and seek out their best plan to win. So far they have lost both games in different ways. 

In the past two post seasons whenever the opposing club has tried to adjust their style of play against the Hawks it hasn’t worked. 

When Chicago lost to Detroit in last year’s playoffs the Wings didn’t need to change anything. Actually Nashville played the best against the Hawks in this post season and they didn’t change anything either.

Are the Flyers going to follow in the footsteps of the Canucks and Sharks?

It sure seems like I have seen this movie before and it doesn’t end well for Philly. 

Al’s Shots 

Once again Brian Campbell didn’t play in the final five minutes of the game.

Kane only played one shift in the final six minutes.

The Hawks coaching staff has done an outstanding job of using their personnel. Hurt feelings don’t matter at this time of year.

Mike Richards kept getting tossed from the faceoff dot but that was ok for the Flyers.

Richards was still a winner 60% of the time and when he was booted Jeff Carter was able to win at a 64% clip.

The Hawks still won the faceoff battle with 52% win percentage but Bolland had a tough night. He was only six of 23 for a dismal 26%.

If Andrew Ladd comes back who sits out…..Tomas Kopecky or Adam Burish?

It will probably be Burish and he won’t like it, but Quenneville doesn’t have much choice.

Tomas Kopecky played another strong game and if Ladd is healthy he is too valuable not to use.

Jordan Hendry had a nice game and he will gain more ice time next season.

Duncan Keith had six blocked shots.

Brent Seabrook led the Hawks with seven hits.

Kane did have three shots but the Flyers have defended him well.

Philly also did a nice job against the Hawks power play.

The Hawks are 10-0 this post season in games decided by two goals or less. 

Those interested in listening to my post game comments with XM’s Jamie Shalley can click on the link below.

http://rcpt.yousendit.com/882199137/9c5fc7af0cb8ef68e304fff908087302 

I have been very impressed with the Flyers forecheck so I asked Keith about it after last night’s game. 

Q.  Duncan, the Flyer fore-check, is that the best you’ve seen all year?
        DUNCAN KEITH:  I don’t know.  They’re pretty good.  Let’s put it that way.  Definitely got some guys with a lot of speed.  Especially on their forwards who can get in there quick and create some havoc.  Anytime you get in there with some speed, it’s tough.
        But we as defensemen, that’s our job to get back, make quick plays and smart plays, and get the pucks out to the forward.  Definitely Philadelphia is good at the fore-check, for sure.

blackhawkswin@comcast.net

Share this nice post:

Filed Under: Al CimagliaChicago BlackhawksFeaturedNHL

Tags:

About the Author:

RSSComments (12)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. Dave Morris says:

    Al, another excellent summary from you.

    It was also fun to hear your question to Duncan Keith on the NHL On The Fly broadcast last night.

    You’ve given us an accurate perspective on the series up to now.

    Most seemed to agree these teams were well matched. With the margin of error so slim, the difference in both games has been key scores and key saves at key times.

    As you’ve pointed out, the Blackhawks’ depth is also a difference maker.

    Leighton is showing the same kind of weaknesses Nabokov did in the Sharks series…giving up goals at critical times.

    Philadelphia is, as you say in your podcast, the best team the Hawks have played so far in the playoffs…conversely, the Hawks are the most difficult opponents the Flyers have faced.

    Chicago has an outstanding opportunity tomorrow night as they know how to win on the road.

    Re: Campbell, I have a feeling that his recently broken clavicle and rib have him playing through constant pain. That may be why Quenneville limited his ice time.

    • djd says:

      Dave,
      I think Campbell is not a defensively sound and Q feels more comfortable with Sopel in tight games with a slim lead. Hence, Campbell doesn’t see much ice in the waning moments of the game.

      Looking forward to the team going on the road again, hoping for a repeat of San Jose and Vancouver. Everything is coming up 7s now. Seven straight wins, seven straight road victories, but the real number is two …

  2. Ken says:

    Al,

    Great read as usual. Nice call by me predicting 2-1 (or 1-0). What an amazing run by this Team. They won the last game against SJ playing only 45 minutes of that game. They win a pre-season type game in the opener. They can’t get out of their own way in the third period last night. They hit a goal post with an empty net. They win without their two best offensive players being their best (kudos to Hossa and Sharp for scoring in this series). Kopeckey and Eager with game winning goals?!

    Niemi has now “stood on head” in a game in the last two series, which is what you need a goalie to do. It is tough to know what to expect on Wednesday. Seven consecutive wins. Seven consecutinve road wins.

    GO HAWKS!

  3. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof, Hockey Independent. Hockey Independent said: Al Cimaglia – Hawks Take a Commanding Lead While Flyers Search for Answer http://bit.ly/cNneuv [...]

  4. Dave Morris says:

    Al, the trash talk continues…this from Peter Laviolette today:

    “Niemi’s a rookie goaltender playing in the Stanley Cup finals. We have to get on the board here tomorrow night and put a little bit of doubt there. It’s a tough position, goaltending. Niemi’s representing a city that hasn’t won a Cup in 50 years. We have to give him a crack of doubt. We can do that tomorrow night.”

    • Ken says:

      Tough talk form a coach forced to choose between two journeymen or career back-up goalies. I’ll take my chances with the rookie.

    • vito says:

      I heard that too and the first thing i thought was DESPERATION. Hopefully Niemi shows Laviolette that nothing distracts him.

  5. Al Cimaglia says:

    I really don’t think Laviolette’s talk was out of line…

    Q. being the pro he is just didn’t respond.

    Philly has to get to Niemi tonight…or the Cup may hit the ice on Friday night.

    • Dave Morris says:

      Al, latest news is that Ladd is still out, while Carcillo is in again for tonight’s tilt.

      One question being discussed by Kevin Allen on NHL Live today was what Laviolette will do if he wants to get Mike Richards away from Bolland. Allen said “that means he has a choice of putting Richards up against Toews or Sharp’s lines…not an easy decision.”

      • Al Cimaglia says:

        Mr. Allen has just expressed why the Hawks have won the previous 2 series…

  6. Dave Morris says:

    Al, as close as the score was tonight, I believe your previous observation of the Flyers’ effective forecheck was quite prescient.

    Philadelphia managed to outplay the Hawks in the third period for the second game in a row…but for Niemi’s outstanding goaltending, this could have been a victory for the home team in regulation.

    IMHO the Blackhawks will have to be much stronger in the board battles and their own forecheck on Friday.

    Looking forward to reading your thoughts on this one.

  7. Art Shatley says:

    I have no clue why alexa sent me to this blog but I might as well say I am now quite intrigued by the blog content you have sourced together. How many years did it take to end up with that many users hitting to your pages? I am fairly to all this.