<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fearless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/</link>
	<description>NHL hockey blogosphere of your favorite team rumors, trades, opinion, recaps, previews and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Fearless &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2919</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Fearless &#124; Hockey Independent -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2919</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof, Hockey Independent. Hockey Independent said: FEARLESS by Al Cimaglia. Chicago&#039;s premier NHL blogger explains why the Hawks are unstoppable http://bit.ly/94tHLx #blackhawks #nhl [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by BDGallof, Hockey Independent. Hockey Independent said: FEARLESS by Al Cimaglia. Chicago&#39;s premier NHL blogger explains why the Hawks are unstoppable <a href="http://bit.ly/94tHLx" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/94tHLx</a> #blackhawks #nhl [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2823</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2823</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Right now there isn&#039;t much to seperate about five or six teams...as you know many times the playoffs don&#039;t go to form. 

That said the Hawks will be one of the favorites if Bolland and Burish come back strong and they can all hit April fairly healthy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now there isn&#8217;t much to seperate about five or six teams&#8230;as you know many times the playoffs don&#8217;t go to form. </p>
<p>That said the Hawks will be one of the favorites if Bolland and Burish come back strong and they can all hit April fairly healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vito</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>al your rite about the canucks being the next obstacle for the hawks to overcome. the style that canucks , predators and ducks play is the one style that can make it close games to hawks and wings style if you look at games in the last few years those teams have kept games close but i think its a bigger fight for those teams than it is for the style the hawks and wings play therefore i would love to see the hawks meet any of them in the playoffs it will prove what kind of team the hawks are</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>al your rite about the canucks being the next obstacle for the hawks to overcome. the style that canucks , predators and ducks play is the one style that can make it close games to hawks and wings style if you look at games in the last few years those teams have kept games close but i think its a bigger fight for those teams than it is for the style the hawks and wings play therefore i would love to see the hawks meet any of them in the playoffs it will prove what kind of team the hawks are</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Morris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>Al, I agree completely with your perspective regarding the comparison with previous Hawks teams. This group is remarkable for its youth and depth.

As one watches the current Blackhawks progress, and realizing most of them are in their early twenties, one can imagine they will only get better. 

Troy Brouwer is now the player attracting the accolades from NHL pundits. After Keith, Seabrook, Kane and Toews, Brouwer has been added to the &#039;list&#039; of  top notch talent on the club.

Stan Mikita and Bobby Hull were just 20 and 21 when they won their Stanley Cup.

Perhaps these new Hawks are closer than we think to the big prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, I agree completely with your perspective regarding the comparison with previous Hawks teams. This group is remarkable for its youth and depth.</p>
<p>As one watches the current Blackhawks progress, and realizing most of them are in their early twenties, one can imagine they will only get better. </p>
<p>Troy Brouwer is now the player attracting the accolades from NHL pundits. After Keith, Seabrook, Kane and Toews, Brouwer has been added to the &#8216;list&#8217; of  top notch talent on the club.</p>
<p>Stan Mikita and Bobby Hull were just 20 and 21 when they won their Stanley Cup.</p>
<p>Perhaps these new Hawks are closer than we think to the big prize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yep... the Wings were beat up and the schedule couldn&#039;t have been worse for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230; the Wings were beat up and the schedule couldn&#8217;t have been worse for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vito</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2812</link>
		<dc:creator>vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2812</guid>
		<description>al you&#039;re rite about that the crosby penguins cannot compare to 91,92 team IMO the pens would have never won last year if the wings did&#039;nt get beat up by the ducks and alittle bit from the hawks plus for some reason the nhl wanted to start the finals so quickly and have saturday and sunday games and it showed towards the end of the series the wings were out of gas. i still believe a full detroit team is still the best team and Al you have stated this last year in one your blogs and i felt the same way about it </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>al you&#8217;re rite about that the crosby penguins cannot compare to 91,92 team IMO the pens would have never won last year if the wings did&#8217;nt get beat up by the ducks and alittle bit from the hawks plus for some reason the nhl wanted to start the finals so quickly and have saturday and sunday games and it showed towards the end of the series the wings were out of gas. i still believe a full detroit team is still the best team and Al you have stated this last year in one your blogs and i felt the same way about it </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As far as a comparison to past Chicago teams they are probably deeper although younger.

Going back only to 1992 this team is probbaly more skillful but less experienced.

I know there are other very good team out there...But last years Penguins team isn&#039;t as good as the one that beat the Hawks and won two Cups in a row.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as a comparison to past Chicago teams they are probably deeper although younger.</p>
<p>Going back only to 1992 this team is probbaly more skillful but less experienced.</p>
<p>I know there are other very good team out there&#8230;But last years Penguins team isn&#8217;t as good as the one that beat the Hawks and won two Cups in a row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vito</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>dave you are rite i thought the same thing about last night one thing i noticed was toews in the second lost a couple battles along the boards and he looked super tired but then in the third period when sharks tied it up and the timeout super toews came in to the rescue as well as the whole team but toews is pure leader and winner last night showed. in comparing a past hawks player to keith i totally see doug wilson except the shot but he is getting better and better last night he was awesome but its nice to hear comparison to a 61&#039; hawks team it gives me a warm feeling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dave you are rite i thought the same thing about last night one thing i noticed was toews in the second lost a couple battles along the boards and he looked super tired but then in the third period when sharks tied it up and the timeout super toews came in to the rescue as well as the whole team but toews is pure leader and winner last night showed. in comparing a past hawks player to keith i totally see doug wilson except the shot but he is getting better and better last night he was awesome but its nice to hear comparison to a 61&#8242; hawks team it gives me a warm feeling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Morris</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>Al, I think those of us who had concerns about the Hawks&#039; weaknesses may have been encouraged by not only level of effort last night against the Sharks, but also the quality.

&#039;Fearless&#039; is as good a word as I can think of.

The marathon NHL season is being played at a frenetic pace this year because of the Olympic break. It&#039;s reasonable to believe that at some point teams have gaps in their game simply because of the mental and physical fatigue.

What I found remarkable about last night&#039;s performance was that while the Hawks were clearly tired in the second period as the well-rested Sharks poured the pressure on, the Blackhawks found the strength to withstand the onslaught.

They never let the Sharks take the lead--though lesser teams would have--and the Hawks, Version 08-09, would have.

The overtime win was pure courage, and desire to vanquish a worthy opponent.

This is a very, very different group of Chicago Blackhawks than the fresh faced one that surprised everyone last year.

They remind me very much of the powerful Hawk teams of the 1960&#039;s and 70&#039;s. Hossa, Toews, Kane and Keith are every inch the superstars to match Hull, Hull, Mikita, and Pilote. They are of course very different as individuals, from those players (though I see Pilote and Keith as startingly similar). There is a mix of energy, skill, and controlled aggression, that evokes those Hawk squads. 

Troy Murray has said he believes this year&#039;s team has the elements to win the Stanley Cup. He has expressed the opinion that their will to win will determine, even more than their talent, how close they will come to realizing that dream.

I agree with that view.

Based on what we saw last night, I think it would be difficult not to agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, I think those of us who had concerns about the Hawks&#8217; weaknesses may have been encouraged by not only level of effort last night against the Sharks, but also the quality.</p>
<p>&#8216;Fearless&#8217; is as good a word as I can think of.</p>
<p>The marathon NHL season is being played at a frenetic pace this year because of the Olympic break. It&#8217;s reasonable to believe that at some point teams have gaps in their game simply because of the mental and physical fatigue.</p>
<p>What I found remarkable about last night&#8217;s performance was that while the Hawks were clearly tired in the second period as the well-rested Sharks poured the pressure on, the Blackhawks found the strength to withstand the onslaught.</p>
<p>They never let the Sharks take the lead&#8211;though lesser teams would have&#8211;and the Hawks, Version 08-09, would have.</p>
<p>The overtime win was pure courage, and desire to vanquish a worthy opponent.</p>
<p>This is a very, very different group of Chicago Blackhawks than the fresh faced one that surprised everyone last year.</p>
<p>They remind me very much of the powerful Hawk teams of the 1960&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s. Hossa, Toews, Kane and Keith are every inch the superstars to match Hull, Hull, Mikita, and Pilote. They are of course very different as individuals, from those players (though I see Pilote and Keith as startingly similar). There is a mix of energy, skill, and controlled aggression, that evokes those Hawk squads. </p>
<p>Troy Murray has said he believes this year&#8217;s team has the elements to win the Stanley Cup. He has expressed the opinion that their will to win will determine, even more than their talent, how close they will come to realizing that dream.</p>
<p>I agree with that view.</p>
<p>Based on what we saw last night, I think it would be difficult not to agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vito</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>i guess i would like to see the hawks meet the canucks in the playoffs because i think the hawks will take it more seriously to see what kind of team we have before we do any trades and you&#039;re rite Al that would be the biggest obstacle. i remember coach Q screaming at someone on the ice towards the end of the canucks game and i dont  think it was the ref maybe a little frustration came out but march 5 should a good one. Al, i really hate the canucks and i dont hate any other team but them because they seem to be a bunch of whiners and they play pretty dirty but thats my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess i would like to see the hawks meet the canucks in the playoffs because i think the hawks will take it more seriously to see what kind of team we have before we do any trades and you&#8217;re rite Al that would be the biggest obstacle. i remember coach Q screaming at someone on the ice towards the end of the canucks game and i dont  think it was the ref maybe a little frustration came out but march 5 should a good one. Al, i really hate the canucks and i dont hate any other team but them because they seem to be a bunch of whiners and they play pretty dirty but thats my opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Cimaglia</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Cimaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I believe the Hawks biggest obstacle now is the Canucks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But they have to play their game against all the top team for a majority of the game.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Ducks know how to win but aren&#039;t deep enough. They appear to be on the cusp of the playoffs and if they fall short...They will be active this summer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They have Getzlaf and Perry to build around.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A healthy Wings team would be a problem too.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the Hawks biggest obstacle now is the Canucks.</p>
<p>But they have to play their game against all the top team for a majority of the game.</p>
<p>The Ducks know how to win but aren&#8217;t deep enough. They appear to be on the cusp of the playoffs and if they fall short&#8230;They will be active this summer.</p>
<p>They have Getzlaf and Perry to build around.</p>
<p>A healthy Wings team would be a problem too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vito</title>
		<link>http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/al-cimaglia/10535/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyindependent.com/blog/?p=10535#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>al great writing, brouwer has a lethal wrister he has quite a few of those this year. sharks dont matchup well against puck control teams like hawks and wings but regardless they are a big team that dont play as physical as they should or like the canucks do but am i wrong to think that sharks dont scare me as much as ducks and canucks do? that being said do teams like ducks and canucks wear themselves out more than their opponents because they play that style 82 games plus because as big as they might be it still takes a toll on them maybe that is why hawks won round 2 against the canucks last year. still the hawks need one or two players that have size and physical presence especially on D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>al great writing, brouwer has a lethal wrister he has quite a few of those this year. sharks dont matchup well against puck control teams like hawks and wings but regardless they are a big team that dont play as physical as they should or like the canucks do but am i wrong to think that sharks dont scare me as much as ducks and canucks do? that being said do teams like ducks and canucks wear themselves out more than their opponents because they play that style 82 games plus because as big as they might be it still takes a toll on them maybe that is why hawks won round 2 against the canucks last year. still the hawks need one or two players that have size and physical presence especially on D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

